She very well might be but that Is not the reason she is head of state. That is a by product of her being head of state or the reigning monarch. We do not live in a theocracy my wee rebelious buddy.
It's early and you are obviously still suffering the affects of the alcohol and drugs you consumed last night so I will just say.... No we don't. Now, go to bed and sleep it off. Silly fellow.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...lonialism-of-economic-order-says-pope-francis In other news. Wee Frankie boy is about to throw the doors of the Vatican bank wide and share the wealth with the worlds poor. Hurra for da papa.
Reigned over ? A powerless figurehead monarch. She is head of state, she is not the state. The church has no power in the governance of the country either. So..... Not a theocracy. Sorry Paddy but thems the facts.
She does have power, her family have massive power. Why are you denying this? Aldo the Scots man Hahaha. Slurp slurp.
You are the one who Is in denial Keyrung. You were wrong. You refuse to admit to being wrong. Now you are compounding your stupidity by wriggling like a wee worm trying to get aff the hook. The queen is the head of state in 15 other countries. Are all those theocracies too? Ya daft ****
Incorrect. I think you will find that God - who as everyone knows is an Englishman - is head of the Church of England.
