Disappointing. When it's stuff that we see as pretty straight forward, not sure what they're getting paid to do.
I am aware of the examples you give, as they have been discussed on here previously; I was more interested in how individual posters think it should be structured. I thought you had said it was reported to be 50% of the old one, so not too shabby really, as that was for a PL club. It would appear that Flamingo Land have had their own marketing strategy out there for some time and this has probably been a Plan B for us with the shirt front getting extra funds - this jumping on the charitable aspect is nonsense and you know it. A constructed whinge using hindsight indignation and you call me a ****ing ****er.
"It's expected that black shorts and orange socks will complete the new Hull City Home Kit." Is William of Orange also our sponsor?
The charity thing wasn't my idea and I certainly never said the new deal was 50% of the old one, personally I'd be surprised if it's anywhere near 25%. Your previous post just suggested you though it an impractical proposition, I merely pointed out that other clubs had found it practical, I never suggested it's what they should have done. And yes, I did call you a ****ing ****er, you're picking fights with me over absolutely **** all and I'm afraid that's Dutch's job(at least it used to be).
Nothing in my post suggested it was an impractical proposition and you are mistaking taking issue to your comments with picking a fight, there's a clear distinction between the two.
