I don't think they're that stupid that they can't manage to market the connection already while Tigers is 'only' our nickname.
Shirts always look better with no sponsor on them, but that's a nasty collar they've got going on there.
Jesus Christ I'm not convinced this is better than cash converters. The business is far more ethical but reckon we'll get more stick for it. ****ing logo looks dreadful.
I don't think it's a nice shirt, I just meant Leeds could probably get more than us yet they've gone sponsor-less. Not that it matters, our badge ruins the kit before a sponsor has the chance to.
collar looks identical to Everton's third last season http://www.umbro.com/en-gb/shop/everton-201415-mens-third-shirt/#/558015/ but it'll have like two massive stripes on each side of the chest Or it might be this at a stretch... collar is different but yeh http://www.footballshirtculture.com...-shirt.html#prettyPhoto[gallerye9a1414187]/4/
This deal smacks of desperation though... DOubt we're getting much for it, it's only a year apparently and it's been dragging on for a while now, just feels like last resorts. Shows how small we are seen from a marketing point of view. Is it me or sponsors are getting worse and worse these days? Either pawnbrokers, gambling companies, payday loans ... the type of companies sponsoring has really changed in last few years.
As would the club, within reason. We got Flamingo Land because they offered more than anyone else. It's as simple as that.
I'd agree they probably where the only one !!! So are the Abbot and Costello confident of the decision tomorrow I wonder ??? And people banging on about ethics ????? Is caging up animals that should be out in the wild more ethical ???
