Unless you want to count the advertisments for his failing business... no.
Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.
- Thread starter BBFs Unpopular View
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
Unless you want to count the advertisments for his failing business... no.
He's not only got one right, he gets it right most of the time, while the IPCC consistently get it wrong. Proven fackts without a doubt
Again commenting on something without knowing anything about it Toby
I've only commented on what you've put forward, which was one example. I don't profess to have any in depth knowledge of the man, as I have no real interest in him. I was merely commenting on the fact that one swallow does not make it summer...........
So feel free to pipe down
you ****, I bit. Here fishy fishy
Sorry about the bitchiness mate
they are right i am a ****....
and don't you given em milk cos they are hungry? Red always waited till they were crying.
[HASHTAG]#fatheroftheyear [/HASHTAG]
No wonder his kids wanna get as far away from him as possible, somewhere like Guatemala
Didn't happen, did it
Tobes knows nothing about this subject but feels the need to chime in, and expects to be right using his "simple logic" as he calls it, which unfortunately doesn't apply to a subject and science he doesn't understand Arrogance and ignorance hand it hand.
To back up Corbyn as not being some magic 8ball gazer. There are a lot of "sources" from alarmists that slate him and completely misrepresent his work, so people like the alarmists on here can go read exactly what they want to read, without ever having to properly research this topic so they can get all arrogant while remaining ignorant.
Svensmark and Christensen's work also supports Corbyn's work. [HASHTAG]#scientificsource[/HASHTAG] < something Tobes is allergic to.
http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/IASTP/43/
Solar activity and temp over 100 years
solar activity and temp over 400 years
Solar activity and temp northern hemisphere over 140 years
Northern Hemisphere temp and solar activity.
Now Tobes where is you rebuttal of this, no opinions please, your opinion of me doesn't mean anything it is just bitter hot air.
No skeptical science links are allowed cos the site is run by the same people who frauded the 97% consensus. John Cook et al
Good solid science backing Corbyn up. Those stupid physicists eh with their snake oil
Arrogance and ignorance hand it hand.To back up Corbyn as not being some magic 8ball gazer. There are a lot of "sources" from alarmists that slate him and completely misrepresent his work, so people like the alarmists on here can go read exactly what they want to read, without ever having to properly research this topic so they can get all arrogant while remaining ignorant.
Svensmark and Christensen's work also supports Corbyn's work. [HASHTAG]#scientificsource[/HASHTAG] < something Tobes is allergic to.
http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/IASTP/43/
Solar activity and temp over 100 years
You must log in or register to see images
solar activity and temp over 400 years
You must log in or register to see images
Solar activity and temp northern hemisphere over 140 years
You must log in or register to see images
Northern Hemisphere temp and solar activity.
You must log in or register to see images
Now Tobes where is you rebuttal of this, no opinions please, your opinion of me doesn't mean anything it is just bitter hot air.
No skeptical science links are allowed cos the site is run by the same people who frauded the 97% consensus. John Cook et al
Good solid science backing Corbyn up. Those stupid physicists eh with their snake oil
Guesses made based on the number of sunspots big enough to be visible
Sunspots have been recorded by scientists for hundreds of years MITO
A filter on a camera can let you see sunspots, same with telescopes with filters back then
All very pretty but do you have evidence that his predictions are better than others?Tobes knows nothing about this subject but feels the need to chime in, and expects to be right using his "simple logic" as he calls it, which unfortunately doesn't apply to a subject and science he doesn't understand
To back up Corbyn as not being some magic 8ball gazer. There are a lot of "sources" from alarmists that slate him and completely misrepresent his work, so people like the alarmists on here can go read exactly what they want to read, without ever having to properly research this topic so they can get all arrogant while remaining ignorant.
Svensmark and Christensen's work also supports Corbyn's work. [HASHTAG]#scientificsource[/HASHTAG] < something Tobes is allergic to.
http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/IASTP/43/
Solar activity and temp over 100 years
You must log in or register to see images
solar activity and temp over 400 years
You must log in or register to see images
Solar activity and temp northern hemisphere over 140 years
You must log in or register to see images
Northern Hemisphere temp and solar activity.
You must log in or register to see images
Now Tobes where is you rebuttal of this, no opinions please, your opinion of me doesn't mean anything it is just bitter hot air.
No skeptical science links are allowed cos the site is run by the same people who frauded the 97% consensus. John Cook et al
Good solid science backing Corbyn up. Those stupid physicists eh with their snake oil
Tobes knows nothing about this subject but feels the need to chime in, and expects to be right using his "simple logic" as he calls it, which unfortunately doesn't apply to a subject and science he doesn't understand
To back up Corbyn as not being some magic 8ball gazer. There are a lot of "sources" from alarmists that slate him and completely misrepresent his work, so people like the alarmists on here can go read exactly what they want to read, without ever having to properly research this topic so they can get all arrogant while remaining ignorant.
Svensmark and Christensen's work also supports Corbyn's work. [HASHTAG]#scientificsource[/HASHTAG] < something Tobes is allergic to.
http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/IASTP/43/
Solar activity and temp over 100 years
You must log in or register to see images
solar activity and temp over 400 years
You must log in or register to see images
Solar activity and temp northern hemisphere over 140 years
You must log in or register to see images
Northern Hemisphere temp and solar activity.
You must log in or register to see images
Now Tobes where is you rebuttal of this, no opinions please, your opinion of me doesn't mean anything it is just bitter hot air.
No skeptical science links are allowed cos the site is run by the same people who frauded the 97% consensus. John Cook et al
Good solid science backing Corbyn up. Those stupid physicists eh with their snake oil
I'm a businessman, not a scientist.
So I'll take my view on the accuracy and success of his forecasting BUSINESS. His business was so ****e, that he had to take it off the stock exchange in 1999, due to the fact that it blew £550,000 in 2 years.
He's patently made a fortune out of his predictions
I'm a businessman, not a scientist.
So I'll take my view on the accuracy and success of his forecasting BUSINESS. His business was so ****e, that he had to take it off the stock exchange in 1999, due to the fact that it blew £550,000 in 2 years.
He's patently made a fortune out of his predictions
Then why are you giving it socks about science and agreeing with things when you've no idea.
As you said you claimed being right once is not proof of anything, but he wasn't just right once. His predictions are especially important to farmers, they need to know if they need to harvest early because with corn, if there are rains at the end of the growing season they need to harvest early otherwise more profitable mill corn will have to be sold as cheaper feed corn, which costs farmers money, also they need accurate forecasts for hay production too. They pay him for these predictions because of his accuracy.
This is where his success lies.
So, it is not just "one" prediction. He's a businessman too tobes and it seems he is doing well predicting weather.
Put it this way, if you sell your predictions, how many could you sell if they are wrong? How can you make a business out of it, and become so well known if you are wrong as much as the met office?
Also I am not a scientists either, but it doesn't stop me knowing my subject before I weigh in, food for thought
Latest space weather news
(July 6 0852UTC) The geomagnetic storms are subsiding. Sunspot Region 12381 is growing quickly and just released an M1 Class Solar Flare.
(July 5 0400UTC) The Kp Index has hit 6, meaning earth is in a Level 2 Geomagnetic Storm
(July 4 2208UTC) The Kp Index has hit 5, meaning earth is in a Level 1 Geomagnetic Storm
(July 4 1912UTC) There is a Level 1 to 2 Geomagnetic Storm Watch due to the arrival of a coronal hole stream in the solar wind.
(July 3 2206UTC) An M class solar flare erupted from the Sunspot Group 12378. An impact from a coronal hole shockwave is expected in the solar wind this weekend.
Upticks in output, solar wind heating up.
We are being hit with more energy, enjoy your summer ;D
(July 6 0852UTC) The geomagnetic storms are subsiding. Sunspot Region 12381 is growing quickly and just released an M1 Class Solar Flare.
(July 5 0400UTC) The Kp Index has hit 6, meaning earth is in a Level 2 Geomagnetic Storm
(July 4 2208UTC) The Kp Index has hit 5, meaning earth is in a Level 1 Geomagnetic Storm
(July 4 1912UTC) There is a Level 1 to 2 Geomagnetic Storm Watch due to the arrival of a coronal hole stream in the solar wind.
(July 3 2206UTC) An M class solar flare erupted from the Sunspot Group 12378. An impact from a coronal hole shockwave is expected in the solar wind this weekend.
You must log in or register to see images
Upticks in output, solar wind heating up.
We are being hit with more energy, enjoy your summer ;D
Yeah pretty much. We've been recordng them since they were first seen over the centuries.
Pretty good correlation to temps over centuries I must say, so the question is, with all this climate stuff in the news, how come this doesn't get airtime?
I have already shown NASA are fraudulently changing the history, they have already "abolished" the medieval warming period 600 papers support and deleted the 1930s dust bowl in the US from the historical record too.
Any evidence he is better than others?Then why are you giving it socks about science and agreeing with things when you've no idea.
As you said you claimed being right once is not proof of anything, but he wasn't just right once. His predictions are especially important to farmers, they need to know if they need to harvest early because with corn, if there are rains at the end of the growing season they need to harvest early otherwise more profitable mill corn will have to be sold as cheaper feed corn, which costs farmers money, also they need accurate forecasts for hay production too. They pay him for these predictions because of his accuracy.
This is where his success lies.
So, it is not just "one" prediction. He's a businessman too tobes and it seems he is doing well predicting weather.
Put it this way, if you sell your predictions, how many could you sell if they are wrong? How can you make a business out of it, and become so well known if you are wrong as much as the met office?
Also I am not a scientists either, but it doesn't stop me knowing my subject before I weigh in, food for thought
You keep asking this, what would you consider evidence, the only thing I could imagine would provide evidence to you is actually hearing him state something and then seeing what happens, so, why don't you buy one of his predictions and then see if he is right? All legacy predictions and events observed from the internet can be called false, we have no way of knowing it is legit.
BBC or C4 made a short doc on him years ago because of his accuracy, they don't make docs about people who are no better than the 5 day meteorology standard prediction spell, the fact he does it months ahead is exceptional ergo they thought it worth a documentary.
Then why are you giving it socks about science and agreeing with things when you've no idea.
As you said you claimed being right once is not proof of anything, but he wasn't just right once. His predictions are especially important to farmers, they need to know if they need to harvest early because with corn, if there are rains at the end of the growing season they need to harvest early otherwise more profitable mill corn will have to be sold as cheaper feed corn, which costs farmers money, also they need accurate forecasts for hay production too. They pay him for these predictions because of his accuracy.
This is where his success lies.
So, it is not just "one" prediction. He's a businessman too tobes and it seems he is doing well predicting weather.
Put it this way, if you sell your predictions, how many could you sell if they are wrong? How can you make a business out of it, and become so well known if you are wrong as much as the met office?
Also I am not a scientists either, but it doesn't stop me knowing my subject before I weigh in, food for thought
You're not a science expert yourself, so why the are you giving it the biggun?
You **** around with computers for a living, so your science 'expertise' has come from ****ing google.
A quick google search doesn't even turn up Weatheraction at companies house btw, so I'm guessing he can't be running a major business, as it's not even a Limited company ffs. He's also trading out a micro firms business centre in London.
Big time this lad isn't he......
You're not a science expert yourself, so why the are you giving it the biggun?
You **** around with computers for a living, so your science 'expertise' has come from ****ing google.
A quick google search doesn't even turn up Weatheraction at companies house btw, so I'm guessing he can't be running a major business, as it's not even a Limited company ffs. He's also trading out a micro firms business centre in London.
Big time this lad isn't he......
This is where you fall down. How thick are you mate. (no laughy face or facepalm)
I am using scientific data produced by scientists, I am using science to back up my points. I do not need to be a scientist to understand the data, I would need to be a scientist to PRODUCE the data. Are you really that stupid?
I understand the science that produced computers yet I could not actually do the science to create computers.. do you understand?
So it comes down to the credability of the science sources I use, and they are credible.
- Status