If it`s Ryder none of the above is relevant. He`s a mag, writing(ish) in a magrag and the mags can`t stand him. Says a lot about the bloke.
But he didn't. That's a non issue. The issue is the Lee Ryder up to his annual games, lying and making an idiot of himself.
What do you expect? One eye on the keyboard and the other watching telly. He`s obviously not good at multitasking.
Maybe if he turned the telly off, that part of his brain could have done his research to see we're not interested in the player
It does get my goat how some of these Journos just coast through a career making a lot of money churning out **** a child could write. We're lucky we've got Chris Young at the Echo, sensible, cautious in his wording, realistic, genuine nice guy and one of few you can trust if he says something is true from our end. But he never abuse the trust of the club, he'll tell you if something is bollocks but he'll never give away club secrets. He's a credit imo with a good club relationship. The you look up the road at their relationship with the local press and how both sides behave.
He could have. It doesn't matter either way, it's not a yardstick to measure a club's status. Saying saying they're 'not interested' doesn't mean they were never interested. The kid's a very good player, most PL teams would be interested I would imagine.
I'm not saying that though. I'm saying that somebody saying we're still in for him despite already ruling ourselves out is weak journalism what the story is built on lies. It hardly covering his own arse opening him to the usual ridicule through his own laziness in a desperate attempt to try and create weak propaganda. Guess you need to live closer and follow the two clubs closer to understand the local media. I know **** all about the local Manchester football media, How reliable, who has the close relationships to the clubs and has earned trust. SAFC and the Echo have a good relationship with a set of reporters who've established and maintained trust. Where as Newcastle United have alienated all media and the Local Media behave like mavericks in a lawless world. It's like Eutopia and Wild West in comparison. Look on the mag board. Nobody mentioned Sunderland, most are skeptical about the whole thing. Even they know not to trust these sources and nearly all of them won't believe media until they're posing in a Newcastle shirt. Apart from Albert who's running around like an excited little kid starting a new thread on every tom dick and harry who's linked with them
If a player had the choice Newcastle or Sunderland, it would be us. Bigger and better in every way. And what boils your piss is, you know it's right.
Don't think that's true. If I was a player looking at the clubs I'd see Advocaat and Short vs. McLaren and Ashley and it's obvious which is the more attractive. Sounds like you're living in the past somewhat.
What a load of bollocks. It might have been true a few years ago, but now there's hardly any difference between the two teams in the league, and we school you off the park every time we play you nowadays. You might have more fans but when they're organising protests and boycotts because of their deluded sense of entitlement that hardly seems to count for much. Newcastle is a nicer city, granted, but players can live wherever they want in the area and still get to training. And when it comes to choosing between working under Advocaat and McClaren, any player with two brain cells to rub together will know which is the better option.
