Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Yeah yeah whatever, people can read.

I know you are not basing you claim of the Kennedy killer carrying out 9/11 based on that video and that is why I asked you what next.

As usual all I ask of you is to back stuff up and off you go again.

 

Of course, with any terror attack there will always be classified sections of the report.
The classified parts will detail what intel they got on the attack, where they go the intel from, and what actions the administration took immediately upon it happening.
Lots of stuff that shouldn't be made public.

No one hates American politics more than me, and their government is a disgrace, but I think this crosses too many lines of insanity

 

Why do you keep referring to me and what I do, you have been misquoting me all day and here you go again because you are absolutely diabolical at any sort of debate because you are mentally lacking

 

NO!!!
Its not the front of a plane.....its a wing
How could that be the nose, thats not a sideways view of the collision. Its a face on shot.
Unless the plane hit it whilst flying sideways, thats not a nose, its a wing

 

How do you know this? You are just spouting there mate. How do you know this?

 

Could I dare possibly ask for evidence for this as Its practically all I have done on here all day and people have seen you continually dodge. yet you just keep going on about it being a personal attack.

 

Because I have seen tons of footage of the second plane collision, the only sideways footage I found was taken from behind the first tower that got hit, so you cannot see the second tower, or one taken from New Jersey shore, 40 miles away that shows next to nothing and one that was such horrible quality you cannot make anything out.

And how do you know it isnt? You are spouting too

 

wtf are you on, drugs? You obviously have no cue about this mate, that is a side view of the WTC south tower, not where the plane entered, the plane entered on the left and the cone exited on the right. Not sure what you are looking at but I suggest you go look for yourself on tube, you are wrong
=

please log in to view this image

the top left image is from the opposite side view of the tower

 

?

 

BO it could nto be the wing obviously
no ****ing damage tor nothing, look at that

please log in to view this image

 

No I have no cue at all

please log in to view this image

But that is not a planes nose cone, its far too narrow.
It could be anything, looks like a wing to me.

 

Again... ?!!!!

 

The **** is that?!
Looks like someone drew that on Paint shop Pro

 

For that to be the wing the plane would have had to rotate 90 degrees inside the building and the wing survive all that steel and concrete, ludicrous

 

Why are you so convinced its a planes nose cone, doesn't look anything like one in the slightest?

 

I am not 100% sure its a wing, or what it is to be honest.
One thing is for sure, its not a planes nose cone, because, as you said, it would get mushed.
So whats the argument?

 

It's a still frame,

Dont you know? there is not one quality video of that plane strike go look at the video, there is no damage until the engines supposedly hit

 

If you're not disputing that a plane hit the building, what does that grainy image of the opposite side of the tower matter???

The shot showing debris shooting out from the opposite side doesn't mean that it needed to leave a ****ing enormous hole behind it. The entry hole was only the size of the plane, debris exiting the other side obviously just blew out small sections, but that photo proves **** all if you believe the plane hit.

 

So you are saying its a hologram or CGI then?

 

Video, slow mo, backs up my no damage claim