Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

I don't know? There are theories but that is a fruitless path, all I am trying to establish is if the official story is not true, so if we can say that what we see is not possible it means the official story is not true, and that is all I am getting at.

 

I am not pushing any particular theory but if we accept that this magic could not happen it means two videos are fake.

if two videos are fake, one of which was from a news chopper, then.. more questions must follow

 

It could also be that "we" are misinterpreting what we are seeing.

 

I think a front end of a plane that is over a floor high and caught from two different angles passing through the building in tact leaving no exit hole with the building facade and floors in tact is a pretty big misinterpretation of what we have been shown over and over and is in all official DVDs

What way do you interpret it?

 

Lets not forget Bo, the plane passed through the outer 14 inches then the core and then exited through another 14 inches of steel and concrete

please log in to view this image

makes no sense. These planes come apart so easily. I've been in a 737 you could break through one with a sledgehammer ffs, never mind 500 knots slamming into reinforced steel and concrete

 

The no plane conspiracy floated the hologram idea, as it's the only way they can explain the ****ing massive plane sized object that hit the tower....

You're questioning the lack of a hole, and therefore arguing from the standpoint of the no plane argument. Which in the history of ****tards is the off the ****tard scale in its complete idiocy.

As even if you're daft enough to believe it was an American operation, if you were going to create a terrorist attack that involved planes hitting the WTC's then why wouldn't you just use planes?

 

How did the plane pass through the building. Is that what you are saying because the picture doesnt show that at all. In the bottom left image the plane hit the building on the side facing the camera. That bit of grainy image you see sticking out the side is blatantly a wing, unless the plane was flying sideways its definitely not the nose.

 

**** it lads I give up I concede the argument.

I just wonder about this, you all don't agree and I've been reiterating the same questions all day with no answers that make sense anyways.

I'm a conspiracy tinfoil hat wearing nutcase blah blah.

Those questions have never been answered and I won't get those answers here.

 

Exactly , you would just use ACTUAL planes.
and if the US government were going to digitally edit footage to insert a plane, you seriously think they would do such a ****ty job?
Again i will ask, if they wanted to create a fake terrorist attack why not just plant bombs and say "ohmigod, terrorists have bombed the WTC" why open themselves up to all sorts of bullshit by getting fake planes involved?

I can understand that for Al Qaeda hijacking two planes and crashing them is far easier and cheaper than making, transporting and planting two HUGE bombs without getting caught. But for the US government the exact opposite is true

 

I don't buy into that hologram thing at all, I've seen that bandied about in other theories too, it's nonsense.

 

Ok lets go with the videos are false, what then?

 

Not necessarily saying you are tinfoil hat wearer etc.

Just that you are not prepared to accept that you are misintetpreting an image. That image is a face on shot of the collision not a sideways view of it

 

No idea mate other than if that was the case then it would warrant further examination.

There is so much stuff out there that it is impossible to know what is accurate and what is not

 

I can see the plane, I can see it's dimensions upon exit, I can see the rear of the building. I am not misinterpreting.

The only thing I will concede it that those images could in fact be altered. I've seen the DVDs and it looks the same but I have not compared.

 

But jumping from a dodgy looking video to the same people that killed Kennedy committed 9/11 is a long stretch.

 

The entire 9/11 conspiracy theory spun off on even more ridiculous tangents as theories were taken to pieces. They therefore had to come up with even more outlandish scenarios in order to keep the tale alive.

I watched it, I know what I saw, and the only part of the 9/11 conspiracy that I think holds water is the 4th plane that was on its way to the White House was shot down. I said it from the day of the event and I think they had no choice either.

 

No there is other research that comes to that conslusion, I never related it to the images, you are again making false arguments, you've been doing that quite a bit, if you want proof of that just read back to my corrections of your posts

 

I do agree with this, there is mental stuff, energy weapons and nukes

But I still believe the official line is a lie. For good reason too, and 25 pages of the report are classified to this day.

 

What exit?!?
It didnt exit the building!!!!
It hit the building and exploded.
The image, your supposed "evidence" shows the same thing.

 

So that front end of a plane coming out the other side is not actually there?