Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

No you didnt, you first posted about corbyn being a "super weather man" and how he laughs at CO2 claims and this supports your cause, all fair enough in your campaign . However, to back up his status as an expert you posted the betting issue and this is what I questioned, nothing to do with the ice data.

Asd I said, its OK that you want to big up somebody on "your side" of the argument just dont post stuff you cant back up.

 

All I ever do is ask him for evidence, that he then dodges.

Also he is one of the worst posters on here for attempting to belittle others. Should we have a no criticising other posters rule, hell yeah! Could Sisu stick to it? I doubt it.

 

No I said "the super weather man" because that is what was in the video. I didn't call him the super weather man, that's what ""s are for. A quote.

Also it is accurate, Corbyn predicts weather better than the IPCC, regional weather not only local, and uses science to do it.
It is also accurate to say he laughs at IPCC claims, he does, again not an incorrect statement.

For example, the met are claiming july 2nd hottest day by 0.2 degrees in heathrow, but te weather station is surrounded by tarmac, it's an airport, the urban island heating effect is immense there and you cannot separate it from actual weather temp.

I am not bigging him up as I have shown, I am using his science to back my point because my opinions are based on science performed by scientists.

 

Now you are talking about me again and not the subject. I have answered your psts and proved them wrong

If you are going to paraphrase do it accurately, you are misquoting me as shown in the above post.

 

This is funny, everyone (bar AFC and Bo) wants to talk about me beause they got nothing, all that is left for people to claim I am having a meltdown

 

So the entire US media were in it then?

The numerous cameramen who took those shots, the producers of the shows, the entire editing team, the witnesses, the broadcasters etc etc ad infinitum?

Please explain how this most elaborate of hoaxes managed to silence every single one of the many hundreds nay thousands that must have been involved in this sinister plot

 

Would it be wrong of me to ask do you have evidence for this?

 

I.knew you'd pipe up as soon as his cannabis habit was mentioned, given that you're also a pot head and a fierce defender of it.

You're defending the drug and therefore your own lifestyle choice, not him at all, that's the crux of that post.

Go read the last few pages of this thread and see how when questioned he simply resorted to victimising himself and making out there was a collective movement against him, it's classic paranoid delusional behaviour and to link that to his habit is hardly ground breaking.

He's hardly shy in offering his own thesis on peoples mental states on here btw, so to defend him and attack others is completely one eyed and hypocritical.

 

No you havent, and of course I was talking about you that was in reply to a post about you.

 

Deal with the parts of my post you have issue with.

I have shown, nay proven the CIA are in US media.
I have shown it is impossible for the plane to pass through the building and leave no hole.

You are stide stepping, I am not talking conspiracy I am stating facts. I am not getting into the why who where that cannot be answered. The media content of my post which proves the CIA filter the media and create fake news and work in hollywood to make fake true stories and propaganda is fact.
This throws doubt on your video. So neither you nor I can prove which is tue.

But.. what I can and have shown is that the plane cannot do what the video showed becaue it is not possible, and you will not even try and explain how it is possible, you just avoid it and say "the video" and I have shown enough facts to put the video in questionable circumstances.

yes it was elaborate, but these ****s have been pulling off this kind of thing since the 60s.

Lets not forget the fact that Kennedy stopped a similar 9\11, the same people that killed Kennedy carried out 9\11
Operation Northwoods was a proposed operation against the Cuban government, that originated within the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other US government operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and military targets, blaming it on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba. The proposals were rejected by the Kennedy administration.[2]


Are you telling me this terror plot, stopped by Kennedy, is not the same thing, a pretext for war with cuba, 9\11 a pretext for afghanistan and Iraq


This proves that these elaborate plots are real

this flies in the face of your disbelief

 

Another wonderful FACT.

 

Where did I say this was "a fact" and why did you ignore the fact that the US gov was going to kill their own people to start a war against Cuba?

You are transparent and really bad at debating anything, you are sophist to the extreme, you might wanna look that word up.

Your own stupidity makes you insecure

 

Still no answers from anyone just nonsense. Nothing is backed up by ye, I have backed up my points.

All I get is opinion insults and sophistry in return. This is really fun watching you guys struggle.
There's a lot to be said for knowing wtf you are talking about

 

More ad hominems,

Do you have any evidence that corbyn is better at predicting weather than others?

 

Here's a pictures of the 'no hole'

please log in to view this image

And here's a complete debunking of the entire bullshit 'no plane' conspiracy

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/salter/review.html

Have a good read and come back to me with a detailed explanation of how this could possibly be wrong.

 

Says the guy woh has been slagging me off all day You have misquoted me several times today intentionally, pure sophistry.

I have a caserole I gotta take out of the oven. have fun

 

Another false argument, no one said their wasn't a hole on that side, also you have ignored everything I have answered in your claims so far and ignored the important questions

When did I say there was no hole on that side of the building? That is a false argument, your usual tactic. You really are not as smart as you think you are Tobes, you cannot even follow a linear debate. You sidestep and twist

How does that image explain this

please log in to view this image

 

Does this mean you don't have evidence that corbyn is better at predicting the weather?

 

Pure sohpistry

You went off to the internet for 10 minutes and come back with a picture of the other side of the building Tobes

 

The photo you've posted is entitled the hole that wasn't there, in post #1389, you said it was impossible for a plane to pass through a building and leave no hole, but you're now saying you're not claiming there was no hole?

Sort your story out ffs

Did you read that entire piece btw? Do so, educate yourself.