Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Why do you continually dodge requests for evidence to back up your posts?

 

please log in to view this image

 

As I said earlier get back on track, can you please provide some evidence about piers corbyn winning bets about the weather or using sunspot activity in predicting earthquakes.

That is all I want, no name calling, no silliness, no clips of airplanes, just some evidence please.

Surely even you can understand what your continual dodging of questions says to others?

 

He's obviously run out of cut and pastes on the subject.

Or maybe he's just realised that he's in fact taken the word of a man who apparently predicts the future (****ing lol) at face value, without any semblance of evidence to back up his supposed credibility, as his comments suit his flakey agenda, therefore they're bound to be correct..........

Actually no, scrub that, as that'd take rational thought process and self reflection.

 

Tobes I posted some stuff yesterday and those two fools did the usual "lets not talk about the topic and have a little gay mock-fest"

At that point there was little point in trying to engage in debate.

Now you are here to work in tandem with TT as Astro was yesterday.

The thread shows the facts, I posted stuff and when people including you had no answer the posts became about me and not the topic, then TT predends he is interested in discussing the topic to make out I am being unreasonable. Its a pretty lame tactic.

I post sources, no one else does, and here ye are talking about me again. It's pretty weak.

I also asked questions, backed by evidence and got no answers. You and Astro just ****ed off when faced with something you had no explanation for. You lot always make it about the other person and not the topic if you can't win with your usual tactics.

I feel sorry for you guys, the ignorance is epic.

 

I posted a credible source on the global warming issue and the lads had a little game of slag off the source, making out he was a bit mad talking about predicting earthquakes beause he is a meteorologist. I even posted that I didn't want a bitchfest over the topic.

I then proved that there is an actual science involved with atmospheric conditions and earthquakes and cited 35 or 36 papers. None of that got a response. Both TT and Astro had no clue it was a science.

Then TT starts talking about extremists & 9\11.

Then it went to ****.

Then I brought up the physical impossibilities of 9\11 and no one had any answers except "I saw it ( on an American broadcast BBC had no cameras there) on TV" as a debunk of what is physically impossible, at which point Tobes you ****ed off.

Now you are back talking about me. Like a 60 year old bingo playing woman. Pretty lame.

When all else fail, attack the other person and as Astro did, claim Deltmown when I pick apart his sophist argument and poke massive gaping holes in your "debunking"

 

Do you even understand what debate is mate?

You posted the stuff about Corbyn and now been asked to prove that the claims made about him are based in fact (which are kind of key to the entire premise of what you've wheeled him out to supposedly prove) i.e. that he's made money by predicting the future.

You seemingly can't find anything that backs up this claim, otherwise you'd have posted it. Instead of simply admitting that you've gone off on a tangent and are attacking those who dare to question the credibility of your sources.

p.s. I didn't **** off when faced with some irrefutable evidence I went to bed........another bullshit conspiracy theory debunked right there

 

Again it's about me. Throw in some laughy smiles as if you are laughing and it is all good, and sadly you do this for? attention? Seeking approval from your perceived peers?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_the_messenger

 

"Freud considered shooting the messenger a "marginal case of this kind of defense...of fending off what is distressing or unbearable,"

in your case unbearable because you cannot bear that I disagree with you lads, Astro absolutely suffers from this as does Tobes.

Given it is ALWAYS the same three people Astro Tobes and TerrificTroare, you all suffer from the same mental condition.

 

All about you?

You've posted some information, you've been challenged on it. You've failed to counter the challenge made and have gone off on a tangent accusing those who are questioning the validity of what you've posted, of some form of vendetta.

It's no wonder you lap up so many of these sort of conspiracies, as yer completely paranoid, oh and paranoia is a symptom of what again? Oh yeah.....

 

Jung : "The fact remains that "shooting the messenger may be a time-honored emotional response to unwelcomed news or views from unwelcome sources"

It's related to childhood and primitive instincts.

I guess in a way you guys never grew up in certain mental aspects. That explains your incessant internet trolling.

I feel sorry for you guys. Laugh it off but the pity is very real, want a hug?
This explains why you three band together against me, seeking validation from each other. Which is another interesting aspect actually.

You feel emotional joy from agreeing with each other.

 

Yesterday In your first meaningful post on this thread, you posted about Piers corbyn using his sun spot theory to make better weather predictions than anyone else and in support of how good he was at it you said won Corbyn loads off the bookies betting on the weather.

I replied that I had seen some sunspot weather prediction stuff (probably from Corbyn) but I was unsure of the betting claim and wanted further info on it. You then spent the rest of the night and this morning trying to derail, mock other posters and in general dodge the questions, so here is your chance.

can you please provide some evidence about piers corbyn winning bets about the weather or using sunspot activity in predicting earthquakes.

That is all I want, no name calling, no silliness, no clips of airplanes, just some evidence please.

 

Shooting the messenger?

No lad, it's calling out the messenger for regurgitating bullshit.

If you don't want these crank devised bullshit theories of yours picked over and debunked,then stop ****ing posting them.

In addition, if you're not prepared to answer the valid questions that are asked about the specifics of them without going off on one, screaming that they're all out to get me, then again, don't ****ing post them.

Oh and lay off the green it's definitely giving you paranoid delusions. What you've just posted is off the scale cringe.

 

You dont understand psychology. Go research it. "paranoia" I think you need to look up the meaning of that word.

I also note the similarities in how you guys "debate" with how Israel's defenders "debate". Lots of denial and cognitive dissonance. When faced with facts then cannot answer, you either deny debate of the topic, ignore cerdible sources or attack them, iterate falsehoods, deflect, or attack the other person in the debate.

For Tobes, we recently talked about UEFA and I made incorrect statements aboutn why UEFA was relaxing FFP, you corrected me and I agreed because I was in error. I think you need to be a man, and stop being an obtuse egotistical manchild. Grow up.

 

As for Terrifictroare, he has unhealthy obsessions. He lets minor disagreements consume him. I do feel sorry for him.

 

Also the need to keep responding, with humourless wit and laughy smileys like you are not irriated (it's obvious you are) is a touch manic. Got increased heart rates? Typing faster than normal?

My empathy is real and justified. Grow up menchildren

 

So now the 3 of us who dare to challenge what you've posted are akin to Israel?

What the actual **** goes on in that head of yours?

Go and research paranoia and cannabis love.

Here's a starter for 10;

http://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2014-07-16-how-cannabis-causes-paranoia

 

It's always the same three people Tobes.

Thanks for this example guys, things I must ensure my kids avoid growing up. Never be closed minded and act arrogant when debating a topic you don't know, and above all else don't attack the other person because you don't like what they say or don't like them.

Be objective and willing to examine new information regardless of sources. Examine and validate the information not the individual. Do not exclude information based on preconceived notions not backed by solid extensive research. Avoid seeking agreement to validate your opinions, base them on the best information available not by who agrees with you. Don't ridicule people because they disagree with you.

Cheers

 

Surely that's not another ad hominem from you after all your posturing about shooting the messenger.
my reference to 9/11 and terrorists was merely pointing out you have history for not backing up claims.

So that said and done

Can you please provide some evidence about piers corbyn winning bets about the weather or using sunspot activity in predicting earthquakes.
That is all I want, no name calling, no silliness, no clips of airplanes, just some evidence please.

NB, Its OK if you cant, just explain that it was some stuff you read and took at face value without checking.

 

It's not though. Donga often disagrees with the tripe you post, and this forum only has handful of regulars . If this thread had a wider audience you'd have all sorts of people questioning what you've posted and it's validity.

You seek solace in the role of the victim of some sort of witch hunt. Which conveniently excuses you from actually countering the points raised and having an actual debate on the subject. It's classic paranoid delusion and exceptionally sad.