Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Give it milk

 

Arctic ice increase
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/old_icecover.uk.php

please log in to view this image

Greenland’s surface has gained over 500 billion tons of ice since September
http://beta.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/

please log in to view this image

"But but but.." ah **** off climatology hoaxers with your thermageddon.

 

I hate frauds mate, esepcially scientific frauds, I am sure you can appreciate that at least.

 

Someone nailed it in 1979, uncanny, warming till 2000 and then a cold snap.

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

http://news.google.com/newspapers

 

I love the phrase 'give it milk'

 

For some reason, I read got milk What does "give it milk" mean? indulge me

 

Babies drink milk. When they're screaming and crying, you give them milk to shut the ****ers up.


#notrocketscience

 

oh right, it's not if you know wtf you are talking about. My Mrs breastfed, if you had said give it boob I would have understood

 

What did your wife's tits emit?

#notbeingpersonal























#sisuderailed

 

Who's Sisu? and **** you you badger loving ****.

#youcantderailtheBBF
Dr Hansen of NASA ediited all records global temps in 1999 and released new temps in 2000, here is the old and new temp charts.
he created a hockeystick, this is what NASA does.
He edited global without US temps first, as seen here

please log in to view this image

Then he had to fix US temps..
As you can see here Dr Hansen of NASA deleted the Dust bowl period (that @astroturfnaut kindly posted a picture of a while back) from history by editing out 1930s as the hottest decade on record.

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

but.. here Hansen admits no temp rises in the US, before he edited the charts to match his editing of global temps
In 1999, Hansen himself said that he didn’t see anything happening in the US.

""Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath…..

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country""


Phil Jones and NOAA had clearly stated that there was no warming in the US.

"February 04, 1989 Last week, scientists from the United States Commerce Department’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that a study of temperature readings for the contiguous 48 states over the last century showed there had been no significant change in average temperature over that period. Dr. (Phil) Jones said in a telephone interview today that his own results for the 48 states agreed with those findings."

So here we have NOAA and NASA telling us ther is no warming and a decade later they edit the temp records pre 2000 to show said warming they already said did not exist.

#fraud
#irrifutablefraud

 

Give it milk

 

#youcantderailtheBBF
Dr Hansen of NASA ediited all records global temps in 1999 and released new temps in 2000, here is the old and new temp charts.
he created a hockeystick, this is what NASA does.
He edited global without US temps first, as seen here

please log in to view this image

Then he had to fix US temps..
As you can see here Dr Hansen of NASA deleted the Dust bowl period (that @astroturfnaut kindly posted a picture of a while back) from history by editing out 1930s as the hottest decade on record.

please log in to view this image

please log in to view this image

but.. here Hansen admits no temp rises in the US, before he edited the charts to match his editing of global temps
In 1999, Hansen himself said that he didn’t see anything happening in the US.

""Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath…..

in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country""


Phil Jones and NOAA had clearly stated that there was no warming in the US.

"February 04, 1989 Last week, scientists from the United States Commerce Department’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that a study of temperature readings for the contiguous 48 states over the last century showed there had been no significant change in average temperature over that period. Dr. (Phil) Jones said in a telephone interview today that his own results for the 48 states agreed with those findings."

So here we have NOAA and NASA telling us ther is no warming and a decade later they edit the temp records pre 2000 to show said warming they already said did not exist.

#fraud
#irrifutablefraud

 

A loving,caring father speaks......................

 

and don't you given em milk cos they are hungry? Red always waited till they were crying.
#fatheroftheyear

No wonder his kids wanna get as far away from him as possible, somewhere like Guatemala

 

Piers Corbyn, a Brit and the "super weather man", no one predicts weather like Corbyn, a fact. He makes the IPCC look like conspiracy theorists. He makes the UK Experts of the government look like fools and he has only a fraction of the resources they do, and none of his predictions and forecasts are made the sun not CO2, he is a solar physicist. He laughs at the CO2 claims. This guy is better than all 100+ IPCC models.
@astroturfnaut
Whole countries are his customers.
He used his predictions to bet on the weather betting against what the met office said, with William Hill bookies and he won £££ He won month after month after month.

 

@astroturfnaut
Not looking for a bitchfest mate. #Sunspots

please log in to view this image

 

Not saying I dont believe him, just that there is plenty of research into and I know personally of people who always claim to win at either the bookies,bingo or casino ( different people ). The general thing with people like those I talk about is the finances of betting aren't important, what is important is the having the winning ticket, a classic example of this I actually witnessed was somebody quietly betting on every dog in a race, staying quiet until the finish and only when the race finished declaring to the group that he had the winner and to great cheers of joy offering to buy drinks with his winnings.

Now the particularly strange thing about that episode was that the person in question saw me behind him in the queue to bet and knew I could overhear what he was betting on, yet he also knew that due to the group dynamics etc that i would (and have to this day) stayed silent about his actions.

Now, to get back on track, is our weatherman gambler like this? who knows, I have seen advance forecasts of sunspot analysis that seem amazingly accurate but then if they were so accurate why hasn't he bankrupted william Hill etc?

 

On Piers Corbyn:

"Following criticism of WeatherAction's forecasts in The Times and The Guardian, in particular from journalist Paul Simons, Piers Corbyn banned the use of any extracts of them in any articles unless they were approved by Corbyn. In addition, the above newspapers and any publication which carried articles by Paul Simons were also explicitly forbidden from quoting them."


Wow, imagine whay Sisu would make of this guy if he were in favour of climate change.

He also claims to be able to predict Earthquakes because they are also caused by the Sun.

It's a shame so many people have to die in them since they typically happen to poor people who can't afford his services.

Then again his predictions since 2007 have been total **** so no wonder he now spends more time trying to get attention by talking bollocks in the media.

 

Surely San Francisco could afford him, but then again can you image what it would work like.
Daily report; no earthquake due today
Daily report : no earthquake due today
Daily report: no earthquake due today
Etc etc Person predicting it proclaims themselves as a genius .
Until eventually big feck off earthquake decimates SF.
Person responds to complaints, I never guaranteed my predictions please see clause 4 section v subsections 1-15
Then fooks off to carribean island to retire in disgraced luxury.

Come to think of it I might try it myself