Off Topic Mafia VIII - Mafia vs Zombies

Gerrez vote switch made perfect sense to me. He was plagued to change his vote off himself at Astro's request, he couldn't put it onto the other two bobby said(mikey and ACS) as it couldn't have leveled the vote out so he put it on Astro himself who wasn't in the running at that point, then he got a load of **** for not following Bobby's plan by Astro, despite Astro himself having many opportunities to follow the plan throughout the day by removing his vote from himself to level the voting. But he didn't, he kept pointing the finger at gerrez accusing him of not following the plan. Astro looks dodgy as hell imo.

Valley? Very strange, was he trying to stir the pot AFCesque? Looking like stupid good guy or stupid bad guy. Can't tell which yet but deffo stupid.

RHC? Not aware of any strange voting, could you fill me in?

 

I was under suspicion on day one (albeit, randomly).

In the dying minutes, Bod switched from Mikey meaning Mikey was only on three votes compared to the four votes ACS and I had.

Both Nev and I switched to Mikey in an attempt to make it a three way again but putting Mikey on five (and ahead) so I switched immediately again so that Mikey was on the required four.

If I was a bad guy, I could have easily have left my vote there to save myself and blamed the confusion but I didn't.

Yet, I look on here and I'm under suspicion again because of terminology; I said "regular townie" rather than "ordinary townie". If you look back on previous games, you'll see not many players (myself included) stick to the exact terminology.

Vote for me if you wish but it seems like a waste to me (obviously a 100% in my eyes since I know I'm innocent)

Yet again the less active players are being ignored. Plus Astro's insistence on me changing my vote but to still follow Bobby's suggestion despite not following it himself and refusing to vote for me to put me back on four is dodgy too, far more reason than anything else we have IMO

 

Im not overly convinced gerrez is part of mafia.

He he could have easily changed his vote and aves himself and blamed the confusion on it but he didn't and did try to stick to towns team. Either very loyal town, or clever baddie but willing to think former atm.

Valley vaught my suspicion with few comments.

Gerrez es you say bid switched which nearly saved mikey.. But bod was innocent so that doesn't mean anything?

 

Because when I retracted it both plans were up in the air with the voting pretty split between the two plans, I wasn't going to revote until it was clear which plan we were going with. When that happened my vote went on Gerrez and stayed there as to Bobby's request.

 

Not exactly sure what you mean there

 

I'm wasn't asking you anything. I was addressing each part of bisc's post by player

But the worrying question I have is this. What does 'fill in' mean where you come from? Because I can take a kicking for fun but I won't stand for you trying to shag me.

 

You weren't replying to my quote just to clarify.. That was Sebb you mentioned RHC's name in the one you quoted...

dont nor try get me in trouble with RHC

 

So it was Hope it does get you into trouble though, at least until the game picks up today. I need entertaining.

 

batard!

trying to get me in trouble... How suspicious!

 

It's intrigue rather than suspicious behaviour, I've never seen the lad beyond day one until today. He could be a googlebot for all I know, just crawling in and out once in a while to steal everyone personal details to share with ****ing PPI company's. I want to see RCH in action

 

Why not? He's a pussy cat really

@ RHC

 

He has of the technical mind of a mouse

 

Getting filled in = getting twatted

 

Waits for the inevitable response from @Red Hadron Collider

 

You're in enough ****ing trouble already

 

please log in to view this image

 

He probably won't respond, he's used to it from me

 

thank **** for that.

It means the same to me.

 

Who?

 

Astro
Astro was very defensive when he was almost brought into the tied vote. It could mean anything, he's either
A) an innocent townie and just irritated that he's being included, and obviously wants to survive and not die needlessly
B) a town role and so doesn't want to risk dying, hence the strong defence of himself
C) Scum role, so desperate not to be dragged into it.

I must say on normal days it probably would not have been focused on too much as no one would like to be pulled into a lynch vote when the Cop has identified 3 others as being up for the lynch. But because we have so little info to go on this gets focused on and Astro comes under suspicion.

Due to our lack of info I'd be happy for Astro to be one of the candidates in the lynch vote, but I think there are other suspicious guys that should be in on it too as many posters have said as well. We don't have a lot to work with, hopefully if we put 3 or 4 suspicious looking characters in the lynch vote something will come up and we'll get a few reactions.

Valley
Valley I also can't work out. Not sure if he really was trying to increase the lynch vote to 4 people to help someone else (which would imply he could be mafia), or if he had a scum read on Astro so wanted to add him, or if he was just looking for a reaction from people. I'd also consider Valley for the lynch candidates for the same reason as Astro, i.e. we have so little info to go on this is better than just randomly selecting someone.

Gerrez
Gerrez is only suspicious due to the whole regular townie vs ordinary townie dictionary battle. Again like Astro this would be glossed over most days but because we have so little info it is focused on and seen as suspicious. Including Gerrez in the lynch vote could be an option but he was in there yesterday and there was no real reaction (except from Astro really) so I wouldn't necessarily have Gerrez in the lynch candidates at this stage unless Astro is revealed to be Mafia, then we could return to Gerrez.

Quiet/unconstructive players
Once again a host of quiet players in the game, we could be letting them off the hook by focusing on minor suspicions as mentioned for the above three posters.
I think including some quieter posters would be an idea, but more importantly the posters who offer very little constructive input. Nothing wrong with posters being busy, but its the guys who make a few comments to not appear quiet but never post anything useful that should be focused on. Especially when they never accuse anyone but just go along with the flow, it's all about voting patterns guys...

At this stage I'd like to see a mix of suspicious and quieter players who are gliding by to be put into the lynching mix, but it's really up to what other people think as well. Let us know who you think is suspicious, and who you think are trying to stay under the radar.