2015/16 kit

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
not gonna moan like a drain but 4 key words. they are not hoops. just lines on the front which is disappointing. if it's league rule then so be it but surely a patch on the back of the home shirt needs to be white!
 
And what's with the red collar? The only good thing is the away kit. Don't tell me the hoops don't go all the way around on that.
 
I can't remember where I heard it now, and I could be wrong, but wasn't there some new rule about having numbers on patches for better identification or something. I'd prefer the hoops to go all the way round too but it may not be possible. I'll try find out.
 
I can't remember where I heard it now, and I could be wrong, but wasn't there some new rule about having numbers on patches for better identification or something. I'd prefer the hoops to go all the way round too but it may not be possible. I'll try find out.

Sure they said last season that hoops all way round "confused" tv punters and refs, so tbey bought in the rule about patch on back - load of ****e really, tge red numbers on our championship winning season kit were easily identifiable.
 
Lazy ****ers

You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


All the shirts look fine to me but the badge is hideous, like an ironed on monstrosity from the seventies (when we had a good badge).
 
Lazy ****ers

You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


You must log in or register to see images


All the shirts look fine to me but the badge is hideous, like an ironed on monstrosity from the seventies (when we had a good badge).

For the first time I agree about the badge. Looks fine on its own but does not look well on the jersey. A bit tacky.
 
Sure they said last season that hoops all way round "confused" tv punters and refs, so tbey bought in the rule about patch on back - load of ****e really, tge red numbers on our championship winning season kit were easily identifiable.
Had a look on the FA and Football League websites and couldn't find anything. Maybe it's a premier league thing. At least I'm not going mad, unless we're both going to the funny farm.
 
Thought about it. Failed on not having hoops. Blue looks lighter too.
But no hoops is a big big mistake

Agree. Blue definitely is still from the Nike colour chart and not the traditional deep blue. Back of the shirt looks pants. Not sure about the red collar but like the red pinstripes that border the hoops. The solid blue in that shade looks like the shirt has been washed too many times.

Rangers play best with thick hoops all the way round and red numbers. Ask Gerry and Stan.
 
Agree. Blue definitely is still from the Nike colour chart and not the traditional deep blue. Back of the shirt looks pants. Not sure about the red collar but like the red pinstripes that border the hoops. The solid blue in that shade looks like the shirt has been washed too many times.

Rangers play best with thick hoops all the way round and red numbers. Ask Gerry and Stan.
At least the red bits tie in the Air Asia logo a little. A bit of red also useful for the Far East market, though I think being a decent team and winning half the time would work better. That ****ing badge is doing my head in.
 
Last edited:
I quite like them. At least we have thicker hoops back, only downside is they don't go right round and the badge being ironed on instead of directly printed on a blue hoop in a white colour.

Real question is how many we will sell in comparison to the few we saw last year (going by what I observed at matches)? They go on sale from Sat in the club shop.