not gonna moan like a drain but 4 key words. they are not hoops. just lines on the front which is disappointing. if it's league rule then so be it but surely a patch on the back of the home shirt needs to be white!
I can't remember where I heard it now, and I could be wrong, but wasn't there some new rule about having numbers on patches for better identification or something. I'd prefer the hoops to go all the way round too but it may not be possible. I'll try find out.
Lazy ****ers
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
All the shirts look fine to me but the badge is hideous, like an ironed on monstrosity from the seventies (when we had a good badge).
Had a look on the FA and Football League websites and couldn't find anything. Maybe it's a premier league thing. At least I'm not going mad, unless we're both going to the funny farm.Sure they said last season that hoops all way round "confused" tv punters and refs, so tbey bought in the rule about patch on back - load of ****e really, tge red numbers on our championship winning season kit were easily identifiable.
Thought about it. Failed on not having hoops. Blue looks lighter too.
But no hoops is a big big mistake
At least the red bits tie in the Air Asia logo a little. A bit of red also useful for the Far East market, though I think being a decent team and winning half the time would work better. That ****ing badge is doing my head in.Agree. Blue definitely is still from the Nike colour chart and not the traditional deep blue. Back of the shirt looks pants. Not sure about the red collar but like the red pinstripes that border the hoops. The solid blue in that shade looks like the shirt has been washed too many times.
Rangers play best with thick hoops all the way round and red numbers. Ask Gerry and Stan.