Again on UK media, three feminists one dude and some facts. The pay inequality gap is a myth. The feminists don't even compare if the jobs are the same, just total earnings of women v men over a life time So the guy working high rise building construction is compared to the woman working as a receptionist. Men in the UK make up 40% of domestic abuse victims, yet for every shelter place for a man, there is 180 places for a woman. 20 areas of UK law protect girls and women, there are non to protect men and boys. Some more feminist myths trolled out here, and now they also claim women choosing college degrees not in science or such is a result of sexism The bottom line is this does affect society because it changes laws and never in men's favour either. That's the power these groups have.
I agree with the things he is saying regarding mens rights, or at least I would if they were real. He seems to be focusing on a few cases where men have been shafted by women and has blown it up in his head to a full scale epidemic. I don't think Third wave feminism is, or ever will be, anything to worry about. There is no big conspiracy by the female species to "overthrow" men and take sole control of the planet. You will always get ******s who shout "Sexist" and other such nonsense at harmless comments and actions, but I just treat them with the expression they deserve: please log in to view this image
whispers.... heres the thing. if the situation was not equal changing the law to make it equal would by definition not favor men who had it all their own way
Indeed. Its like when the Supreme Court ended segregation in America, the decision didn't favour white conservatives, who had had it their own way for 15 years, and wanted to keep the races apart, but just because the decision favoured one side, doesnt mean it is wrong, it just equalises an imbalance.
Feminism and how it can and does work, silence of criticsm Equality is something no sane balanced person would fight against. A sample of nonsense censorship via feminism. 1. Dean Esmay Dean Esmay is an activist, father, fan of Dr. Who and writer with an interest in issues that affect boys and men. He was invited by Huffington Post UK to become a weekly contributor, and he wrote very well-received posts on the impact of sexual assault when it happens to boys and men and on domestic violence as an issue that affects an entire family, not just women. Esmay is also the managing editor at A Voice for Men, the largest, most influential website in the men’s human rights movement, and as such is regularly denounced as a misogynist and sexist. When Soraya Chemaly, a feminist writer, discovered that Esmay was writing about gender issues from a non-feminist perspective, she tweeted that it was a mistake—and one that would be corrected. Within hours of that tweet, Esmay’s writing disappeared from Huffington Post UK. 2. Chris Good Chris Good is a musician, father and writer who “has recently become known for his views on gender equality and the position of feminism today. He hopes his writing will prompt civil discussion of the issues and serve more to mediate between the two sides of the arguments presented.” Good wrote some thought-provoking and well-received articles that were also published on Huffington Post UK, but the day after Esmay’s writing was removed, Good’s articles were also removed for including the clearly offensive statement “I am an advocate for women’s rights. I have daughters and hate the thought of them facing discrimination, harassment, catcalling…or whatever else. I want to help create a society where they can safely prosper and choose whether they work or keep house, or both. But I have a son too, and I reflect on the discrimination I, and others, face because we are male. I do not want him to experience that which I have seen and felt.” These are the words that Huffington Post UK has now deemed unfit to publish, apparently at the prompting of feminists. 3. Milo Yiannopoulos Milo Yiannopoulos is an associate editor at Breitbart London and “one of the best-known technology and media commentators in Europe.” Yiannopoulos is also critical of feminism, liberalism and pretty much all nannying-isms out there. He tweets as @Nero and contributed frequently to the hashtag #GamerGate, and while he demonstrates little patience for fools, Yiannopoulos never tweeted anything that was even vaguely threatening, abusive or harassing. Nevertheless, his account was suspended by Twitter for the crime of disagreeing with feminists and other social justice warriors. The feminists bit off more than they could chew, of course, and @Nero was unsuspended. It’s very difficult to silence one of the most well-known media commentators in Europe, but let’s keep in mind that feminists tried. If given enough power, they will silence all dissenters. That should give us pause for thought. 4. Dr. Philip Mason Dr. Philip Mason is a British scientist and atheist vlogger best known for his YouTube channel Thunderf00t. Mason produces snark-filled, sarcastic commentary that eviscerates his targets, but again, in no way is any of his commentary abusive, harassing or threatening. Mason takes apart people and ideas and demonstrates why they are dumb. Having your ideas stripped down to bare bones and your intelligence questioned and mocked is an unpleasant experience, no doubt, but Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and any other number of media personalities would surely agree it’s not abusive. Mason, however, made the mistake of questioning gamer critic Anita Sarkeesian, including hilariously mocking her master’s thesis, in which the only piece of data she collected disproved her entire argument, but she appears to have not noticed. Mason was suspended on Twitter as well, apparently for linking to the Sarkeesian YouTube videos. Once again, feminist critics bit off more than they could chew and after a two-month absence @thunderf00t was restored. Given enough influence though, feminist media censors would silence this voice. 5. Mykeru Another prominent voice in the atheist/skeptic community is a vlogger who goes by the name Mykeru. Mykeru is also a critic of modern feminism and committed egalitarian. He specializes in showing feminists and social justice warriors the logical fallacies they engage when defending their arguments, and he does so in a way that is cutting and often mocking. Again, this does not constitute harassment, abuse or threat, and yet his Twitter account @Mykeru was also suspended. Several Twitter activists started #OpSkyNet to demand that Twitter unsuspend his account, and they were ultimately successful. #OpSkyNet continues to work to have other accounts that were merely engaging in criticism restored. These five examples are evidence that when feminists are given power to address the very real issue of genuine harassment, stalking and graphically violent threats, they use that power to silence critics, reframing that criticism as abuse. in many cases the anti sexism movement is used for a sexist power grab Facebook has essentially declared that feminist dogma is the prevailing and unquestionable community standard by which now hundreds of millions of Facebook users musts abide. Tennis Girl the pop culture art of yer one scratching her ass, banned from Winbledon's art show, by feminists. Supermarkets are now targeted to stop selling lads magazines. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wo...-banning-lads-mags-would-patronise-women.html Feminist groups get commedians prevented form performing. Obviously if you listen to this comendian it overrides your upbringing and you become a sexist douchebag. https://www.change.org/p/adam-crozier-cancel-dapper-laughs-on-the-pull-on-itv The Irony is, with the france attack and the whole free speech thing where it should be cool to slage off a religious icon without reprisal or censorship, a picture fo a girl scratching her arse gets banned from Wimbledon art show. DC comics cover attacked by feminists. please log in to view this image Matt taylor attacked for this after making history with the Rosetta landing over this shirt. Reduced to tears. please log in to view this image Why has feminism become obsessed with censoring 'the enemy'? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wo...become-obsessed-with-censoring-the-enemy.html They are out of ****ing control these nuts.
Was just wondering why this is relevant or what kind of qualification this is for discussing feminism Not trying to diss the guy, I know nothing about him or his credentials, but just wondered why this is in any way relevant
Hi, I'm Bodanki, I'm a big fan of anal sex, and now I am here to discuss the geo political rammifications of Bio engineering.
You don't need a qualification, he disagreed, he broke no community rules and got banned. I think that is wrong. He got banned because of complaints by feminists
So in both cases of sex and genetically modified terminator seeds you're a fan of ****ing people with things that don't allow natural reproduction?
Are you saying because you like Anal sex you have no right to discuss geo political rammifications of geo engineering?
I am not saying he needs a qualification, just wondered why it threw in that he has a fan of Dr Who. like "Wow, this guy is a Doctor Who fan, he must know his ****"
