I watch and wrote to the manager about how pacey this boy was Murphy tore Notts Forest apart well it seems we are after him trouble is he plays left wing but can only seem to use his right foot but he his fast perhaps our researcher can find my article about this lad but then he possibly won't
http://www.not606.com/threads/playing-squad-2015-16.302612/page-3#post-8071437 Answer that dick head before you start spouting more ****, I love how you go missing every time you're called out. I know you're not man enough to answer the question so it just proves to everyone what an uneducated, contradicting liar you are.
Ristac, I honestly believe you've crossed the line here. The whole substance of this argument has been around who first suggested a player, not who agrees with the suggestion. Leeds60 agreed with his son's initial suggestion & repeated it. Simple as that. Go back & read it all, but try it without seeing red.
What line? I pulled out quotes where he suggested Chris Woods plain for all to see after he took it personal. The guy is a tool, you know it, you just show him more sympathy because you feel sorry for him. If you're right he could have replied with exactly that, instead he said I was a big mouth and to show him where He had suggested Chris Woods so I did just that. He then avoids the thread (as he has previous ones) the moment he is proved wrong and pops up like a smelly old fart with the same ****e new thread a day or two later.
I have no intention of ever corresponding seeing you and your friend again I thought I made that clear.I have asked Matt to reproduce my article dated 17 Feb 2014 where I urge BM to buy Murphy its on JA606 entitled Another Aldi Bargain under my name Leeds62
I knew you would take the easy way out and avoid the previous thread... See WJ I told you Leeds60 please keep your word (for a change) and don't ever mention me in one of your threads again, don't make little quips like you did in the opening post on this thread and then I won't need to reply to your dribble. Don't say you made it clear and then drag me in, doing so just makes you look silly.
Ristac, from experience you will get more name checks now you are "ignored" than when you were recognised. I suspect that there will end up with more people being in this club than out of it soon enough. WJ was just yanking your chain....
Nope, no chain yanking, Just an unbiased appraisal of how the subject started off. No consideration given to the 'first' possibility & Ristac pounces, as though lying in wait for his next opportunity. Classic bullying, IMHO.
It was an honest opinion, not humble. And unbiased. Ask 2 or 3 unbiased others to go back & study the original posts, bearing in mind the 'first' perspective.
You signed off with IMHO - H usually meaning Humble http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=IMHO You might see yourself as unbiased, I certainly don't, how do you define unbiased, anyone who sees it the same as you? Actually no need to answer as it's just going round in circles, Leeds60 has stated he isn't going to correspond with me again so as long as he can keep to that it suits me perfectly
If you'd actually read what your link says, you'd find that submissions 2, 5 & 6 back me up. Always best to check rebuttals, and even better if you read the links you post. Again, if you'd actually read my post, I suggested asking some other unbiased people, 'cos I expected you to have that view.
WJ - the link goes to a page voting for the best answer, number one being Humble Opinion, hence why I said usually. If you want to claim 2nd 5th and 6th are better answers than 1st What more can I say.
They're all opinions. Not one is definitive on that site. I'm sure that there are more appropriate websites from which to get the absolute definition, but I can't be arsed looking. I also note you failed to address the 'bias' thread of our discussion. A simple apology would be fine.
well first of all i am a newbie for posting on here (and a big thank you for all the welcomes) but i have been reading the posts since this site started well almost, and the the thing that i have noticed is that everyone is very pleasant and polite. BUT i have also noticed is that if there is a bit of a kerfuffle shall we say, the common denominator always seems to be LEEDS60 now i don't know if he says the things he says are to start a debate or to cause said kerfuffle or if he is just downright RUDE from what i've read from him he says he writes to the club with suggestions on players that they should look at but igotta ask how do they know who he means when he gets invariably there names wrong ie chris woods and lots of others, the board at leeds must be baffled trying to find these players. personally i find it is really insulting to get someones name so wrong when all it takes is google and find correct spelling.and lets not say it's his age that won't wash i am 64 so i would put a bit of effort in thanks in advance for the good natured (or otherwise) ribbing that i no doubt get but no offence will be taken cheers
Welcome to the forum patb and thank you for your unbiased opinion as was invited by WJ (so nobody should give you any ribbing). Firstly WJ I don't want to fall out with you and won't over any of this (and I won't do). You start with a reply that states I should read my own link with a face palm avatar, I kindly point out it is a link to best answer, what MHO stands for in the eyes of the majority, I also remind you that I used the phrase "usually" stands for. Instead of an apology you thinly attempt to justify yourself. Then you expect an apology from me because I believe your opinion is biased?? Am I reading it different to you?? I am the fist to say sorry when I get it wrong, I can't quite see what you are expecting an apology for??
