Fight of the Librarians - Splashdown

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Cnut the Great said:
What amazes me is a historian such as yourself relates good leadership with good administration, as if they are ****ing mutually exclusive. What a load of bollocks.

Whats more is you totally ignore plenty of other figures that played leading roles in the *****l empire.

It's funny you mention re-writing history. Isn't that what historians have historically done? Your brethren didn't even ****ing know who they were for the better part of half a thousand years.

I'm done. You can **** off if you think you'll get anymore of my time.
Click to expand...

I think you mean mutually inclusive. Good leadership usually equates to good administration, even if the actual delegation of duties is left to other parties.

I have not mentioned other *****l figures, because we are primarily discussing Genghis Khan. But we can do so if you wish.

Historians have been referencing the Jami al-Tawarikh and the works of Willem van Ruysbroeck et al for centuries, so why would you think my 'brethren' were ignorant for 500 years? Historians re-write a subject as additional fact and knowledge become available.

Why be so confrontational? I have done nothing to antagonise you.

You are an intelligent individual with a natural flair for the descriptive, so it's a great shame you've ended the debate in such a manner.
 
We have just witnessed yet another divorce on the forum, if we keep this up we will beat Blind Date's tally...
 
This thread is gearing up to meet expectation <laugh>

Kick his **** in, Ponder <ok>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back