See I personally don't see that that really has the biggest impact. To say Southampton are a bigger global brand than Inter Milan, I really just don't understand the criteria. It seems like it's just a list of "clubs with access to the most £££"
Hard to say mate, they make the money when they are young. I'm reading about a lot of ****ed up 40+ year old ex-players with this problem and that. Seems like they were incapable of managing finances and loving a woman through thick and thin. We had one here last year in York, Clive Carlisle, chucked himself in front of a truck at 6.30 in the morning, seemed to be the usual fanfare, pathetic as it was in sympathy for him but what about the poor ****ing truck driver and the impact it had on him? He was trying to commit suicide, done for drink driving again and money problems, well boo ****ing hoo, welcome to the real world you useless piece of ****. I'd have reversed over the **** personally but that's just me..
I'd say it's the obvious factor what with the table being 'brand worth in dollars', look at palace, if the recent TV money wasn't a factor they simply wouldn't be there. Plus it mirrors the movement on Forbes where all Premier League clubs have made huge jumps in both listings
You shouldn't be arguing on a forum with a lass like you have. You should be shagging from dusk till dawn and only stopping for a beer and pizza.. Ffs, shut the **** up and get in there, oh and don't forget the music..
Well the brand is the club isn't it? So if the club are suddenly bringing in an extra 70m a year than surely the brand is?
Would it be alright if I give your her number and you ring her up and tell her that? If only haha. That's a pipe dream when one half is in full time work and the other is in full time education I wouldn't personally say that a brands value is directly correlated to how much money the club brings in,for example even when Man U were out of the Champions League etc, their "brand" is still much more valuable than the vast majority of clubs. You;re right though, the link is clearly meaning brand in the way that you describe it
It's not explained very well, but my explanation seem the only plausible one. I'm just laying my own logic to try and fathom it.
[QUOTE="John Cardew, post: 8027398, member: 1030523"]Would it be alright if I give your her number and you ring her up and tell her that? If only haha. That's a pipe dream when one half is in full time work and the other is in full time education I wouldn't personally say that a brands value is directly correlated to how much money the club brings in,for example even when Man U were out of the Champions League etc, their "brand" is still much more valuable than the vast majority of clubs. You;re right though, the link is clearly meaning brand in the way that you describe it [/QUOTE] Sounds good, I will happily listen to why she doesn't fancy you Maybe she might like a bit of red n' white..
The question is, is Brand a Brand, whether it be Jo Brand or Russell Brand or is this a brand new concept on the merits of brands?
Agreed mate. She's a red and white through and through pal, you may be on to something there Well, she actually doesn't give a **** about the football either way, but she identifies as a Sunderland fan and her dad is a dyed in the wool mackem so there ya go
Well I've never heard of a Jo Russell but you might be onto something here. Has anyone told David Attenbourgh yet? Might be worth a bit of film..
No wonder you balls hang low mate, surprised she hasn't garrotted you yet haha. Still if it's an annual shag, you can liken yourself to the easter bunny..
One day maybe, I'm sure my mate QWOP will give you advice on seduction techniques, he's a whizz with the ladies..
I'm sure many of the lads on here, QWOP included, have plenty of pearls of wisdom gained from years of experience with the women. Me, I found one I didn't hate and plan to stick with her, that's about the extent of my relationship expe
