Also i want to hear from funky. Why did he pull in another member into the russian roulette last night even if afc went off piste
But i guess what is your reasoning for keeping rhc in the loop. Of course you could have just done it cause that was who we decided but from a townie view it looks like you want to push someone else into the vote to reduce the chances of a fellow member from being up for the lynch
It was all 50/50 then, ask the people the same who put tennis ball and swarbs up, it's because nobody had anything on anybody. My vote changing had nothing to do with the players being voted and everything about afc's late behaviour.
So why isn't your focus on why afc switched? check the voting pattern, afc made the first moves to switch, my switches were based on his switches, forget the names of people being voted, nobody had anything on anybody, hrc might as well have been you, or gerez, or acs, it doesn't mater it was day one nobody knew **** all, see what I mean? With that in mind why did afc start changing last minute, if he hadn't changed at all the result would have stayed the same as it ended, afc initiated the changes, like I said, go and check the order of voting. I was counter acting afc's voting changes wondering what his game was.
Not sure what tennis ball and swarbs has to do with it. If you just did it so rhc didnt get off the hook thats a valid answer. You obviously didn't mind it being a 4 way tie as you didnt cast the final vote. When suddenly it became a 4 way tie involving ibwt you suddenly cast a vote onto rhc (who we know is innocent). The way i read it is that you did this because you and biscan are in it together so by making it 5 way it reduces the chances. I might be reading this wrong and you were just reacting to afcs switch but i just wanted your explanation for it
afc changed because he wanted to gauge any last minute reactions in an attempt to change. He incriminated himself in doing so. He has done this in virtually every game I have played in with him. Again, not saying he is innocent, just stating that it fits in with his previous playing pattern.
Afcs switch was a bit dubious but he did mention he might go for ibwt and also he did switch back to rhc. He has explained enough for me to give him the benefit of the doubt. Switching on day 1 to get someone killed is such a dubious move if you were mafia that i couldnt contemplate them being dumb enough (if you have hats off to you)
I'd just like to say if I was mafia I would not be telling my team to try and make it a 5 way instead of 4 way of I'm one of the people. 1, I'd fancy my chances in 4 way tie 2, would look way too suspicious. Would like to distance myself from the dodgy Sunderland fan
I didn't I voted for him because acf moved his vote from him, no other reason. I didn't mind it being a 4 way tie no, it was that way had afc not changed in the first place, and my vote wouldn't contributed to any of the lynchings just as it didn't in the end. I had no idea if rhc was innocent or not, just like the other lads who were lynched. WE DIDN'T KNOW RHC WAS INNOCENT UNTIL HE WAS LYNCHED this is hard work, you're not even accurate on the events so how can I reason with you? Oh you're reading it wrong.
I still think we need to get the quiet ones up in a tie. Every game game we say this that loud ones get voted early etc and every game we say the quiett ones need to get put up but no one ****ing does it. Mikey, ACS, magic, and partly valley are all very quiet. The first 3 should be prime targets (Lucas as well although as he was found innocent less chance he's a bad guy than the others). So we'll ignore for the moment.
Anyway your answer to counteract afc will suffice. Will make a note of that. With respect to saying rhc is innocent in the scenario i spoke of anyone who further gets put up is not part of your team in my book. Seeing rhc was innocent then we can deduce he deffo isn't in the mafia tan
Yes he did, but he told me he wanted me to vote him to make it a 5 way, when I didn't he switched to to ibwt but it kept it a 4 way. He told me he wanted ibwt to be voted to make it a five way. Alarm bells ring as it came across to me his whole reason of trying to make me switch wasn't because of the wanted a five way at all, he'd tried to manipulate me. so I canceled out his vote change. Replace rhc and ibwt with any other players names as far as i'm concerned. it wasn't who was being voted which was my issue, it was afc behavior with me which didn't add up so I perused him to foil his tactic.
I don't want to be seen to be backing funky up just cos he potentially would have given me better odds but look this way... afc is pushing to get someone to vote for me... They don't so last minute he changes and potentially saved RHC (could have been his mafia buddy). Switching last minute and potentially saving someone looks dodgy especially on day 1 when you have nothing to go on, so all funky did was out RHC back in mix so he wasn't saved by afc's late move. When afc moved back, funky removed so he wasn't seen to be killing off RHC out on his own. Like I say, it might look like I'm defending funky but there is as much logic in his move as there was afc's.
1. IBWT- Not sure at all. Have to be honest. 2. Gerrez- Nothing to make me suspect him thus far. 3. RHC died innocent 4. BobbyD- Ditto with IBWT, not sure 5. Bodanki- Known Innocent (to me) 6. Sir Tennisball died innocent 7. Tobes- Targetted AFC fairly quickly, but only his second game so maybe unaware AFC's late vote move was typical of him. Suspicious, but benefit of the doubt 8. Billy- Suspicious to me, sorry, but again targetted AFC far too quickly and has played enough with him to know better. I dont think he is that dumb 9. Lucas- Suspect he has a role, maybe the Vampre 10. Magic- Finally showed up, 3 games late, better than never I guess. No idea 11. AFCFTW- Late move was typical of him. Nothing else to make me suspect, but I dont think he would be so dumb to make such an incriminating move so early if he were mafia 12. Swarbs died innocent 13. Albert’s chip shop- Not posted much. No idea. 14. Valley. Another suspicious one for me, again jumped on the AFC bandwagon pretty quick, I have a bad feeling about him. 16. Mikey- Suspicious. Think he has a role. though maybe not mafia. Not sure. 17. Funky- Dodgy as hell so far, not played many Mafias on here but he has played it elsewhere and knows the score. Suspicious
I had said in multiple posts that I was suspicious of both you and RHC and my vote earlier in the day had been for you and I had asked for thoughts on me changing back to you... I'd done quite a bit to suggest a vote for you wasn't that odd. I'm not sure if he just misinterpreted the situation or if he is guilty tbh.
