The one and only! Ok so we ended up with three town deaths on the first night and a conversion to a vampire, not a great start. Early suspicion was on me for some late voting which didn't effect the final vote positions, which has generally been accepted as stupidness rather than guilt. And now we are casting potential suspicion on those who voted for me. Lucaaas has been investigated and found innocent which means he isn't mafia but he could still be a vampire or serial killer. Funky has had head to heads with me and gerrez with neither appearing to be planned so you can probably assume neither me or gerrez is on the same team as funky. Oh and there is a theory that the serial killer is possibly not a Liverpool fan. Nothing concrete to go on so far. It'd be good if you voted for billy in my opinion or IBWT if you don't want to vote billy.
Three town deaths on the first night Let me guess, one was RHC? I'll scroll back a few pages and have a look at that theory, if it's not too far back..
Well there's next to nothing to go off at the mo, still don't really know what's going on so I'll monitor things and see if anyone comes up with a half decent theory before nightfall, I'll still be largely inactive but will make an effort to keep up to date etc. It's exam week so will be in and out due to revision etc.
Who are you? did you almost forget but get a nice message from your team mate to come on as you were looking suspicious? come on to get your action off to mito to kill another one of us? Eh eh eh?
Having re read and analysed afcs defence and also his actions last night im in agreement he was just trying to get a tell. People were quick to jump on him though myself included (although i have saved my vote) i would like to know why valley and co were jumping on afc so fast
I know I'm a townie. knowing the mafia could step back and let townies argue and then possibly target them, I've tried to ruffle some feathers to see who comes forward and keeps back and who takes the easy option of targeting bickering. 1. IBWT- I think he's ok. 2. Gerrez- Tried ruffling his feathers, ok for now 3. RHC died innocent 4. BobbyD- Not added much other than encourgae the lynching of bickering. Suspicious 5. Bodanki- Added very little apart from telling people to shut up. Of no help at all. Not sure on him 6. Sir Tennisball died innocent 7. Tobes- Again poured much of his time this morning on AFC. Suspicious 8. Billy- Only really defended himself and afc. Would be suspicious if not for afc's defence. ok for now 9. Lucas- Innocent but could have protected himself. Not mafia but necessarily townie. 10. Magic- Who? Not been posting on other threads to be fair. Not sure yet. 11. AFCFTW- Made hash of day one, spent the morning being made a scapegoat. good for the game contrary to peoples belief, stimulated posting, playing dumb a bit especially claiming confusion over the Gerrez incident so not out of the woods with me yet. 12. Swarbs died innocent 13. Albert’s chip shop- Quiet, was werewolf with me in last game and although was limited for time had plenty of time to read posts and contribute to the werewolf pms. Suspicious, he's a mag after all. 14. Valley. Showing his face but offering nothing, short sentences, mostly in own defence, distinct lack of investigation and actually playing the game. Suspicious. 16. Mikey- Said next to nothing, Suspicious. I will be changing my vote before midnight, online and observing from after 6pm. Got to nip into town.
So basically most people are suspicious I would like valley to defend himself as hes getting quite a few votes. Funky also why did yo decide to vote for rhc top make it a4 way tie?
If you don't ruffle feathers and draw out debate you can't clock patterns, Pointing fingers randomly doesn't progress the game, debate does.
It would be nice to hear from valley, billy and lucaaas as to why they've stuck with voting for me when everyone else seems to have decided I'm probably innocent? I'm not saying that I'm innocent because people are leaning that way, just that it would be nice to get fresh explanations for there votes given the sway in general opinion away from me being guilty.
Of course, it's only day 2 Basically afc was pressuring me to change my vote to ibwt to make it a 5 way. The way I see it anyone who tries to make someone change their votes is perusing two votes to use themselves. It made me suspicious. Then with 5 minutes to go afc changed his vote from rhc to ibwt despite me not changing my vote, him changing votes didn't achieve the 5 way, it kept it a 4 way only with him switching targets. It didn't fit with his reasoning to try and create a 5 way. So when he changed away from rhc to ibwt, I changed from Lucaas to rhc to replace afc original vote. Then afc switched back to rhc so I canceled me vote to return order. So I didn't vote rhc, I actually stuck with my original vote of Lucaas. My vote changes were based on afc changing, he changed back so I changed back. afc is either daft or guilty.
