I changed to IBWT as you had outright refused to vote for him and bring him into the coin flip, instead preferring to try and convince two others to change votes to vote lucaaas with you. So I thought I'd out a little pressure on him and see the reaction, IBWT plead his innocence and since no-one was reacting I believed him and switched back to RHC. At that same moment you voted RHC which was a move to protect IBWT in my eyes as you couldn't get him out of the flip without being suspicious but by voting RHC into the coin flip you had a good reason to hide behind, when you saw me change back you quickly tried to edit away the evidence.
You can't really defend him on this one though Bod (even though you're probably right).....he spent an hour saying "a tie is best bet" and we had exactly that....maybe we should just lynch him and be done with it. What I will point out though is that both you and I could have switched to save our own skins but we didn't Honourable townie warriors....I forgive you for saying I hadn't posted anything sensible all day (you cheeky **** )
I don't think afc is mafia unless he's playing a huge double bluff... I think he's just a **** townie causing loads of confusion in the last minute. I said I was happy to be in the vote and odds of 1:4 aren't awful if you're mafia so if me and funky were in cahoots then I wouldn't have wanted him to try save me last minute as t would look too obvious. I think he's not used to afc messing around last minute so did what he thought was best to get a tie
Took it from one four way tie, to another four way tie and then back to the original four way tie, at no point did I put anyone out for the lynching on there own. It was a vote change that kept the tie but changed who the pressure was on to look for a reaction and I believe I got the reaction I wanted from funky.
Funky was certain he would not vote IBWT and put him in a five way tie but was straight away happy to do it to RHC when IBWT was in the coin flip? Surely someone else other than me sees that as suspicious?
Which it should have done we're not allowed to edit, we have to post a new vote to change it. Least, that's what was said in previous games.
I was the Vampire Lord just kidding, regular vanilla townie, i think MITO just forgot to add it. Sure he will confirm... Was always likely to get killed early on, seems like they don't like us United supporters Swarbs... Feel rather silly now compiling tons and tons of notes on who i thought was suspicious... Good luck town! MITO do we have a dead board where we can chat?
That doesn't make sense. You wanted me to change my vote to make it a 5 way. But you changing your vote only would have led to it still remaining 4 way. Are you saying that's not suspicious? You're vote change wasn't going to make it a 5 way lynching. It looks dodgy as hell as it was such a pointless vote change. For the record, if you hadn't changed back I wouldn't have edited to cancel my vote which would have meant IBWT would have still been lynched. This proves beyond doubt I'm not protecting him, I was canceling out your votes. Blatantly. QUOTE="moreinjuredthanowen, post: 7995014, member: 1010745"]last table unitl 8 table: Bodanki; 3 votes by IBWT, Tobes, RHC billy; 3 votes by Bobby, valley, gerrez BobbyD; 3 votes by billy, lucaaas, albert lucaaas; 1 vote by: funky RHC; 3 vote by: sir tennisball, afc, swarbs IBWT; 2 vote by: bodanki,mikey yet to vote: magic[/QUOTE]
So we lost RHC, Swarbs and Tennis, three townies. And someone was bitten so potentially a four. We started with; 3 Mafia 1 Vampire 1 Serial Killer 11 townies ...its now potentially... 3 Mafia 2 Vampire 1 Serial Killer 7 townies
It's be good to get some fresh reactions to nightfall rather than the mafia spending ages coming up with a plan for the day... Maybe we can each do a list for day 1, each person and what level of suspicion we have and for what reasons?
[/QUOTE] I had posted saying I intended to switch to IBWT, I asked for opinion and thoughts from people, everyone stayed quiet, so I changed, like I had said I would and asked if everyone was ok with it in advanced...
And why had you so strongly said you wouldn't vote IBWT into a five way but then straight away are happy for a five way with RHC? You went from adamant you wouldn't vote to voting for RHC the moment IBWT was in trouble...
