Things We Think We Think #187

Eh? It wasn't a rumour, it wasn't wrong and it wasn't from OLM.

 

It was quite clearly Amber Nectar who said it, not OLM.

Christ.

 

**** off Quill, leave it to the mods, their fights are always the funniest

 

Aye aye, captain.

 

As accurate as it is, there's no need to sign your post nobhead.

You do seem to make a habit of spitting your dummy out and hurling teddies when someone dares to point out your posting bullshit.

Mind you, you're quite good at implying bullshit, so you can deny involvement or take credit depending how it pans out.

Anyway, you're at least acknowledging that it needs to be taken with a huge pinch of salt. There's progress.

 

I'm not arguing with YOU at all. I'm arguing with the point being made.

You're the one trying to drag it down and divert it with half arsed insults and abuse.

 

It's pretty unedifying when board moderators are chipping away at each other on threads like this. This one is far from unique.

In fact, at times it makes threads unreadable. I'm not certain that's the intention, but it's the effect.

You have each other's email addresses. Can't you just bicker it out in private?

 

This board is all about opinion and discussion. Unfortunately, some seem to think their opinion is beyond reproach and get abusive if it's questioned rather than supporting their initial claims, or acknowledging where they may have got it wrong.

People also find that makes the board unreadable too.

 

These arguements are great to read

 

I would have given you more intelligence than that. But then you dont like any of the propaganda being questioned either do you.

 

I've no idea what you mean by that. Are you saying me disliking adults bickering is propaganda? Bizarre.

 

I hate it when Mum and Dad argue.

 

I read it as him saying that me or OLM reporting people's account of a particular experience was propoganda.

Not only are we not allowed to protest, or to walk away, but we aren't allowed to talk about not being allowed to protest either. It's the People's Republic of Hull City Tigers Ltd.

 

Its about time you got off the one trick anti Assem Allam pony that you are riding to admit for once that you actually got something wrong.

 

Sorry but it's the big issue surrounding Hull City and will be for the foreseeable future. I'm not going to ignore it just in case people on the forum get upset about it. I criticise based on the actions of the owners, it's only their fault that the charge sheet is so long. His behaviour isn't measured or reserved so why should the opposition have to be? He's actually got off incredibly lightly on the whole thus far, considering what he's done.

The only thing I've got wrong here was carelessly using the word banners when actually it was cards. It's a complete irrelevance to the point that was made. The issue was protestors having stuff confiscated in an attempt to suppress their right to protest. Whether it was banners, flyers, cards or whatever else is totally unimportant. You and a couple of others are desperately clinging to that semantic to try and pretend that the whole thing didn't happen.

 

You're assuming it was Hull City that asked for protest 'material' to be removed.

First off, you don't know City asked anything of the kind. If they did, Spurs were clearly rubbish at enforcing it.

Over the years, plenty of people have had items removed from them, including bags of posters, simply because the club in question didn't want the ball ache of cleaning it all up after them.

You and others have jumped the gun on a number of issues and been totally wrong, but you still try and imply they add to the list of issues and reasons to hate.

It smacks of desperation. There are enough genuine reasons to dislike the owner, without diluting it by creating or imagining them.

No doubt now and again you'll strike lucky and one of your rousings will have some element of truth, but you'll have lost so much credibility with your wolf yells, people will just yawn. No doubt you'll grab that one element and continue to ignore the other bits you got wrong.

You're actually defeating your own object.

 

You really are detestable. You posted unconfirmed tweets as fact. When challenged by someone actually there you went on the offensive in denial. You've not apologised or retracted any of your crap.
Olm somehow got dragged into it because obviously you ****s stick together.

You both are the voice of HCST. 2 people with their own agendas and tunnel vision in your case with no room for dissent or disagreement. You'll never back down. You'll. never apologise. You wish people who don't agree with you would go away. You think anyone with a different view is irrelevant. No one tells you how to do anything.

It's a shame the trust was taken over by people like you who will always be only interested in their own agendas and **** anyone else attitudes.

It could have been so good for the whole city.

 

It was Amber Nectar that said it was at the request of Hull City. Either they're lying, which seems unlikely, Tottenham's staff got very confused indeed or City did indeed ask for it.

You seem to be banging this drum since the Ferriby thing when you went mental and insisted I was wrong, then like others went quiet when someone else said they'd spoken to Peat and other players who said they stood by the original comments but were told to remove them, exactly what I'd said seemed the most probable chain of events and you'd been having a go at me for. I'd love to see this list of times I've cried wolf you keep banging on about.