I can't speak for anyone else, but as i said last week i just find you very very odd. Oh and its dinner and tea in Yorkshire as well.
Judging by the idiots vying to replace the gormless twat Milliband as leader they won't be winning the next election either. ****ing losers
Shame!! I've already written them off Phil because even if they drop their left wing agenda and return to the centre ground, people won't trust them again next time round once the economy had improved markedly and the Tories have carried out some of the common sense things that the country craves. Binning the human rights shambles act to replace it with a more British common sense version, cut the benefits cap even lower than the proposed 23k as it needs to come down to a much lower amount - people can't be paid more not to work than work for those that are physically able too. Before you lefties jump on the bandwagon, I don't have a problem with those who are physically unable to work but those lazy ****ers who can work can't be allowed to ponce off the back of the taxpayer - thanks to Labour's benefits for votes policy!
Steve the entire benefits system dialogue is skewed towards castigating citizens of this country who receive benefits for not working, whereas little attention is paid to working tax credits which effectively enables large multinationals and big and small businesses alike to pay the minimum wage or thereabouts. So the country (tax payers) are subsiding the wages of people working for the likes of Starbucks etc who then go on to not pay their fair proportion of taxes. Why not legislate for a much higher minimum living wage, so that people do not have to resort to claiming 'in work' benefits and at the same time have a variable rate of VAT (say 100%) levied on the products and services of companies who are sending their profits abroad via tax avoidance measures........I think that this would encourage these companies to either play fair or go bust
Agreed EIO, the working tax credit was unheard off until the last Labour government introduced it, the minimum wage has created that problem whereby companies can legally get away with paying the legal minimum. It has raised peoples living standards though of course to a certain degree compared to the old disgusting £2/3 an hour wages but as ever no system is perfect. Likewise with the legal tax avoidance that Starbucks and other companies have got away with, it's a perfectly legal loophole but totally immoral and god knows how much it's cost the country?! On a similar note, Boris has been calling for a London minimum wage for years.
RCDM whatever that stands for you are probably right I must be odd because I see things differently to you why/ Its called experience and further I must be odd because I have supported this club for more than 64 years !I do carry my heart yes I have one on my sleeve when it comes to my club and up to MC coming I wrote quite frequently to Grayson Warnock and McDermot about various players that I thought would be useful for the club I shall now have my breakfast!
You are the only one stuipid enough to think that any of Grayson, Warnock or Donut, the editor of the daily mail read any of your letters. If you want to write one more letter write to either the club or daily mail and ask this one question. "Do you file letters from cranks and nutjobs in the recycling bin"? I have a question for you:, Do you howl at the full moon?
NO I don't copy you Well if I was such a crank why did Grayson Warnock and Mc DERMOT REPLY . wHY DID WE sign Matt Smith Adam Smith etc
You have heard of typographing signatures haven't you? Important people and football managers have a small army of secretaries and PA's to sift out letters from idiots. So you are responsible for us signing Matt smith? All those scouts we used to have, no wonder they were all sacked? Next time you go to your GP I suggest that you tell him that you keep having bouts of not being able to judge reality...
I think you are guilty of that Norman you think that Milliband was a good leader that's how simple you are
Several weeks ago I posted links to old threads of yours. The links clearly showed that you had not wrote to the club about Smith until after we had signed him. Several members laughed at how you had made a fool of yourself claiming such a thing and here you are doing it again...
Come on guys, this is starting to get nasty and personal. All because of the political differences which I thought it might do going forward. Not nice to see.
That Ristac is a lie I wrote to the club and you can see my post in Jan 2013 some 4 months before we signed him the post is entitled Another Joe Jordan and can be read on the other 606 debating forum that also applies to Adam Smith If you wish to have a wager on it I shall only be too pleased to accept I also mentioned it To Chris Hutchings Adam POPE and Kieran O'regan and Oggie at the time that I wrote to the then manager .He was signed on June 4 on his 24 birthday
I am willing to take that bet because Ii know we have never signed a player that is 224 years old. I wont even hold you to a name. How much we having on this?
