Our medical staff

Oh yes and our midfield are so much better at creating chances for their strikers aren't they?

 

He would have helped

 

Hip! But I'll let you have that one!

 

Do you have the stats showing the number of assists from midfield as a percentage of goals scored for both teams?

 

I've said it before and I'll say it again. We rejected Charlie Austin cos he failed the drugs test. After all the Bullard stuff we werent going to risk it.

 

No and I can't be arsed to look it up either.

 

Then don't make unfounded statements.

 

I didn't.
Do you want to make a case that Huddlestone and Livermore create lots of chances for our strikers?

 

Ah yes, our only two midfield players.

 

Fine... I looked it up.
Only two of our midfielders have more than 2 assists this year. (Quinn 3 Elmo 5)

Matt phillips has 7 assists this season.
What's your point again?

 

Austin looks lively today don't he. The Man C defense are ****ting themselves everytime they see him.

 

That Charlie Austin would have improved our team, nothing you've said since has changed my mind.

 

Well granted I would rather have him on the bench rather than Sagbo.

 

They certainly don't create many for themselves.

Watching the Man City v QPR game on a Slovakian channel (QPR have just capitulated 6-0). At half time they have some some interesting stats on the teams.

One was positions in the table if games finished after 80 minutes (City were not in the bottom 5).

Another was most shots per goal.
Top players were:

1.Navas 42
2=. Jutkewietz (sp) 36
2=. Delph 36
4. Huddlestone 33

 

the only stat that matters is how many points you accumulate at the end of the season.