Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Anybody know about this stuff as I would like to know more?

 

The government released a report about 10 years ago detailing the official history of Britain's biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979. Porton Down sound familiar ??

 

Thanks. I am aware of Porten Down but don't know that much to will have a look.

 

Found this - http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience

 

Hello JB!

Good to see you back mate

 

Hello back atcha and thanks

We needed a win so I was forced into coming back really - every time I have a bit of time off, so does the team

 

What a horrible season mate, I wouldnt mind it finishing today

 

Have we given up on 4th?

Wouldn't mind Gerrard doing something amazing to end his season, he doesn't deserve to leave on a note of failure - like today could be the last penalty he ever takes for us ....

 

I think so, cant see it now

Well a final might have been nice for Gerrards ast game, seems the players couldnt be bothered that day though

 

It's hard to live up to the hype

 

You mean of playing for us?

Losing is fine and Villa were the better team, I just cant take us not putting the effort in and looking clueless from manager and all through the team

 

The US have been spraying their populations for years, up till there was a public law, ones that are laws but they don't tell you about them, you have to look them up, that allowed the US gov to use citizens as test subjects and not protesting that law was considered the same as consent even though you were not aware of the experiment or the law. This allowed for all manner of things to be done on people including causing death. PL 105-85 was the public law. I read the PDF from the US gov site a few years ago, a quote

#lovely

 

I suppose I mean playing for us and also of carrying the expectation of [for this season] being in the FA Cup final. Hyped up as nice way to end Stevie G's time with us etc etc and the players are in the final - in their heads - as if it's a given ..... end result not enough effort put in to clear the final hurdle to actually get there. But as fans we have all the answers eh ...

 

Interesting.

On a similar note, it's not until relatively recently that food producers had to list exactly what was in the food they manufacture for mass consumption. From 'poisons' fed to livestock to additives that could cause all sorts of side effects. Until the clear labelling was introduced, all the toxics/colours/additives were put in there without our consent or knowledge.

 

It's not as bad in Europe as it is in the US, in Europe there is over 1000 chemicals banned fro makeup, there's only about 12 chemicals banned in the US, McDonalds cna use a silicon foam in their chicken nuggets in the US and pink goo they treat with ammonium hydroxide to kill bacteria

But all that will change with deals like CISP and TTIP and the like. We'll be chomping down bovine growth hormone and eating pink slime in no time flat.

Worse stull Monsanto, and these new trade deals will mean all our foods will be sprayed with the cancer giving chemicals that are legal in the US and they will also finish off the bees because no bees makes Monsanto worth MUCH more, so Monsanto couldn't give a **** about bees. Us being dependent on their frankencrops is what their aim is, the entire world on GM crops is their end game.

 

Without doubt, thats why we're all in our 9-5 jobs and not football management

We can see when they lack fight though. I just think we dont have any style, I dont know. I dont think BR's the man for us but so much comes with sacking a manager and starting again, can we finally have a decent transfer window if BR is given the chance? I just think we need a better name, I know that sounds shallow but I look at BR's signings and the way this season has gone and the way we cant just get over the line when it matters. It could change, I hope it does but this is BR's 3rd season now, a long time in football management and we've looked clueless at times this season

Anyway Ignore me, im still pissed at them for Utd and Villa games amongst others and our piss poor European 'adventure'

Anyway, better not derail Sisu's thread or he'll be after us

 

Well our season so far it could be classed as 'dark matter' - so is it a derail

My thoughts on our season - you can forgive anything except lack of effort.

 

Not sure if these guys are in the pay of the IPCC or not but the ice caps melting seems pretty bad to me.

http://news.google.com/news/url?sr=1&sa=t&ct2=uk/0_0_s_6_0_t&usg=AFQjCNGhDvZAOGiFf28pdnLblTocrPZVXg&did=5e846542de3ce73c&cid=52778824499897&ei=B0ZHVev7A8fQa__mgfAD&rt=STORY&vm=STANDARD&url=http://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/14436/20150501/antarctica-is-melting-faster-than-ever.htm

 

People like Sisu will ignore this and instead focus on the far smaller increase in ice somewhere else and "OMG teh scientists know nothing it's only supposed to decrease everywhere it's a #fraud"

 

Ignore what?... I can't see what I am ignoring and I gave replied to every argument you made, all 2 of them cos the rest of your posts were about me.

You ignored facts, not opinions.. like
geological history
Natural sources of CO2
Failed IPCC Modeling
Incomplete IPCC models
Outright misrepresentation of reports by doomsdaying up the summaries to the point that they are a complete lie
The proven manipulation of the 97% claim, scientists who wrote those papers say this, hardly opinion is it.
Other sceintists work (cos you like consensus not proof which is a fact cos you depended so much on the 97%)
Record ice gains since 2012, and again this year (Ice loss being the cornerstone of the IPCC domsday scenarios) Sea level rises back this up, fact, and you ignored it.
Volanoes under the ice (Yet more proof the IPCC does not and cannot model natural CO2 sources)
That the IPCC does not and cannot know how much Ice there is(didn't stop them claiming there would be little left by 2020 - 2050
Other sceintific work I have posted on here, in fact, you claim that world leading experts (are having a #meltdown in their report)
The origins of the #fraud and the factual account of how it all began, accoridng to you it's "the only good thing Thactcher ever did"?
How they swtiched (very quietly) to MMCC from global warming when their CO2\temp cause was totally busted.

Oh and you also ignore that the IPCC have NEVER EVER BEEN RIGHT ON ANYTHING
Now only a "believer would believe" in the face of evidence to the contrary. You form an opinion based on, your opinion


So, you paraphrase all that and more into the usual comedy channel "just cos it's cold where you are, doesn't mean the planet is not warming up" kind of comment as if that is the argument I make.


None of you "believers have offered one coherent debate in defence of the IPCC and you least of all Astro cos you have ignored almost everything that flies in hte face of what you believe.


Now as we speak the IPCC are claiming that they are "now downplaying their forecasts" because and get this "because of the deniers"
Put that into context of being 400% wring, so they are not downplaying forecasts cos their previous were in some cases 400% higher than reality, but it's because deniers are not beiving them(because everythig they said was a lie) which it was.


So if you would kindly quote for me this new info that I am ignoring I'd appreciate it, someone obviously is offering a better point of debate than you have, I'd like to see it without having to edit my ignore list. But we both know, anything I will post in reply to ANY argument, you Astro will, in your self delusion, go into wum mode. It's what you always do when you just can't compute the information given to you.

Case in point, you went missing when I proved that the 97% was bullshit. Again you just go at me SO much fail it's not even funny.

So lets see this great argument.

I can't keep reposting every decent argument I've made every time you slate me Astro. Even when I post just 3 scientists talking about how the IPCC twisted their work, you called it spam even tho it was in the context of proving you wrong, which it did 100%

You debate like Bill O'Reilly from Fox news, it's actually scary.

Sad man indeed. Winning for you is more important than knowing what is true. Football wum\banter doesn't translate well to this sort of subject