Question

Would you rather have feet for hands, or hands for feet?

I'd go for hands for feet.

 

Aye... Hands for feet for me.

 

Tina would be ****ting all over her hands is she had feet for hands

 

She could gallop though.

 

I'll consider this while having my morning dump and will update you with my conclusions shortly.

 

I would have feet for hands, as I miss not being able to bite my toenails like I could when I was younger

 

OK, I'm back (number 4 on the Bristol Stool Scale if you're interested).

I'm going to go with hands for feet. If you had feet for hands, it would be difficult to do anything that required any manual dexterity - it would be awkward to have a **** for a start.

Chimps, on the other hand, pretty much have hands for feet and they seem to be able to walk about OK. They also have the advantage that they can easily swing about in trees and that would be great fun.

 

I'd rather have feet for hands because I can't walk on my hands.

 

I saw an orang-utan masturbating with his foot once. (On TV)

 

I'm double jointed, I've done it loads using both feet.

 

You could get away with flipflops for shoes and drive a spastic charriot instead of walking so hand feet for this digit loving lazy stylish fat Chink ****er.

 

yes , i prefer hands

 

Dae ye aye?

Massa Timeshare Attorney. Is that like one of them really annoying ****s?