Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

Sisu,

I think those photos are the inside of an orange, the guy is just winding us up!

 

Copy and pasting images he had nothing to do with obtaining doesn't make the text he wrote any less wrong.

science = what Sisu thinks something looks like

I'm sure you're intimately familiar with the appearance of high temperature plasma

 

So you've got one group of scientists saying one thing, and another group saying something else. If you believe one group you are enlightened, the other you're a mug.

Hmmm...

 

More like you have almost every single qualified scientist in the world saying one thing, and the lawyers and journalists paid by companies whose profits are endangered saying another.

 

I tend to agree, but I was trying to be objective and point out the folly of criticising someone for believing what they're told by one group whilst readily accepting the evidence put forward by another.

 

You would possibly be right.. if the photos came from him

They are from a Swedish observatory with a pretty damn ****ing good teleschope

please log in to view this image

 

It's a great instrument.

Shame that the 837 papers that have used it's data have all been completely wrong because they don't use Robitaille's model.

 

You are saying one theory is right because of how many people support that theory?
And you accuse me of lacking critical thinking... ..

I think you are even thicker than I originally thought, with your static world where nothing new is ever discovered, and nothing ever rediscovered

 

It's obviously a conspiracy.

Newton derived an equation to describe gravity. Einstein developed an even more accurate one. The weird nature of quantum mechanics forced itself to be accepted by the astonishing accuracy of its predictions.

Robitaille shows pictures of the Sun and says that they really really look like liquid hydrogen.

Why won't people listen?

 

Antarctica Ice thicker than thought, or modeled.

#youmeanitsnotallmeltingaway
#IPCCwillsurelytalkaboutthisNot

http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v8/n1/full/ngeo2299.html

British Expedition. "have a good idea of area BUT we don't know how thick it is"
How the **** does that fit in with IPCC bullshit claims for the last decade

IPCC claims of ice melting and the whole hyperbole of seas rising, when they don;t have the slightest clue how much ice there is, is just Plus sea leavels rising within historical norms.

#fraud

 

Let me guess, you only read the title?

The point is these vehicles can measure thick ice near the coast that ships cannot access:

"We suggest that thick ice in the near-coastal and interior pack may be under-represented in existing in situ assessments of Antarctic sea ice and hence, on average, Antarctic sea ice may be thicker than previously thought."

They haven't done a large scale survey yet.

Nature have an entire journal dedicated to climate change: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/index.html

So unfortunatetely you won't get much support for your lies and conspiracies, unless you're happy to continue completely misrepresenting the truth

 

#astrobait.

I actually posted it just to point out the Ice doom and gloom nonsense, the rest, was totally for your benefit

tho to be fair to me, the IPCC never ever use their massive media mechine to report on this kind of thing.

 

That your position is so weak it can be completely refuted in a matter of minutes?

I get it, it's like pretending to be a ******ed Christian and denying evolution just to weaken the creationist case

 

#thereismoreice
#ipccsaidless

#lessiceinthenorth
#moreiceinthesouth

climate change
not man made c(lie)mate change


The astounding arrogance, to think we can keep the climate the way we like it which is what we intend to do by dialing a CO2 knob


Regardless of disagreements what I will say now is a fact, not up for debate.
Our climate system starts at the bottom of the ocean and extends into space. So large portions of our climate system, what influences it, is not included in IPCC failed models, Failed, failed consistently over 10 years, not one model right ever.
Only a religious lunatic would keep faith in such models, or fraudsters.

No amount of stupid paraphrasing and attacks on me will change that Astro

#incompletemodels
#incompletescience

 

Is the Sisu #meltdown man-made?

 

Cosmic ray and cloud formation. Given our shield is 10% weaker and there are absolutely more clouds.

But IPCC do not model any factors from space, so it must not be true.
Researchers in the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) are hard on the trail of a previously unknown molecular process that helps commonplace clouds to form
http://www.dtu.dk/english/News/Nyhed?id={ABB2F1B4-F5F7-4452-BB39-9818EA7CB8F9}


Not valid science cos the IPCC religion doesnt use it in models

We also know literally nothing about our ocean floor either.
But that also doesn;t matter cos it's not in IPCC hyperbole models that are ALWAYS WRONG

 

Inactive sun, more gamma rays and more interference from space, thrown in 10% weakening from out own EM shield and it's a climate forcer.

Also some work out there on the fact that up until recent times cloud formations had decreased over the past centruy tho there was no global model for it.
Less clouds=more warming more clouds=less warming

Could that explain the pause in the temperature since 1998?

IPCC don't even want to discuss it, cos it don't fit into their models. The insantiy is clouds block sunlight so it boggles the logical mind why they just go off on their CO2 rant

 

I reckon cutting down trees and putting down concrete changes local weather more than gamma rays somehow.

California is drought central now. when i was there they still never replanted trees burned in forest fires years before and the plae was hue concrete jungle.

the more trees you have the more local climate has mositure IMO.

theres plenty of clouds round here i reckon...

 

Sorry gents I am currently farting in my room and measuring temperature to determine if my farts are warming the planet.

My modelling will only include the gases from my own body and I will write a report that will be edited by non scientific individuals (to make it dramatic and inaccurate) who will then release it to the press as a doomsday scenario.

Then there will be a fart tax and I can receive 27 billion a year of which I will use almsot 20 billion of on media to attack anyone who dissents from my claims.

 

I can confirm it is in fact getting warmer in my room, have been eating lots of beans. Temperature is definately rising.

Stupid conspiracy theorists keep pointing to my heater being on but that is not part of my model so I spent another two billion paying people to come up with the debunking article about my window being open so there is no need to include the heater in my modelling.

I spent another 3 billion debunking another scientist who did a paper about the insulation in my walls and the effect on temperature too as that is also not part of my models.
I also made sure there was pressure put on his colleagues so that they pulled out of co authorship papers with him and used media to work up the public so much that the guy felt like he was literally in danger from my religious fanatics, the constant pressure and harrassment forced him to retire.

I've done such a good job with my billions spent on media now that my religious fanatics will attack anyone that dissents.

#science
#jobdone