It is my understanding that all PL clubs were given their money from the PL as is usual. Separate to that they were all approached by the PL to sign up to an agreement to commit to £200k of funding support for an Away Supporter's Initiative. Hull City, Hull City Tigers or whatever the piece of **** calls us, signed up to the agreement. We are where we are.
Not read past here and can't bevarsed to either so this has probably been said but, you've done a great thing helping to bring colour and visual support to the ground. What's pissing everyone off is the fact that the club are refusing to use the ASI money on what it's meant for and will now make a load of ****e as a cover up. It's sad they've chosen to use a supporters good will in their attempt to brush their robbery under the carpet, but this is Hull City so we shouldn't expect any less. What we mustn't do is allow the club to make yet another fracture in the fan base by pinning any blame or fault whatsoever on you, which is undoubtedly what they wish for. Actually, you changed your Facebook page name in a show of solidarity. You can **** off.
Because you're a ****. An unwashed, thrush riddled, stinking ****. **** off from here Steve you're a prick.
How can sane people still be blindly supporting Allam? Unless they are stubborn King Canute types or desperate for success at any cost. Either way all you pro Allams need to try and think about the wider picture to see them for what they really are. Morally bankrupt bullies who should not be allowed to steamroller their way through our club and everything else they come into contact with. Only you the feeble minded will allow this. Have a word with yourselves. Cowards.
The first part of this is my issue, something very good funded by fans and arranged by fans has now been tarnished by it being associated with something disgraceful the club are doing, namely refusing to give the fans any benefit from the ASi fund. The two should very much have been kept apart in my opinion. The more important thing I had to do last night, was the announcement of No.1 daughters engagement.
You really really read far too much into things, it was changed because a lot of the work I'm doing at the moment is Hull City based and it's just a play on words
It's you making that link and tarnishing it to try and make a point about the ASI money. The banners and flags for not606 still have the same spirit and ethos they started with. The fact the club also like the design is praise for mauled's work and the efforts of people on here.
You are still sticking with the assumption that the flags will be used to justify the ASI spend then?
I posted on here before the Swansea game that the club intended to use the ASI fund on t-shirts and flags. This information came straight from the horses mouth, although a certain cretin suggested I was making it up. The people who make the financial decisions at City have decided this is how the money is to be spent.
And on a thread about the ASI, people are moaning that it's being discussed. The argument seems to be that because Mauled is involved in the flags we should just forget about the ASI shambles in case he gets offended.
The flags seemed to be popular. Plenty getting waved. No need for people to try to tarnish our flags for their own ends. If some of the money has been spent on flags, what's wrong with that? It'd only be a fraction of the money. Just because you've been lead to believe it has to be on travel or tickets doesn't mean that's true. The information on the league site says it wans to encourage a variety of initiatives. A fiver off a ticket as some clubs have done could be criticised too. Yes, the money should be seen to be spent, but trying to drag the 606 flags into this is poor form.
