Off Topic Werewolves

These took a while to find

These are some of the ones I was referencing about dropping hints to you. (post numbers early 800s)

The posts about the 'lowly villagers' being explained were posts #865 and #880 (I think)

 

Current state of affairs...

Funky - 5 votes (MITO, LHTN, Bobby, TGE. Morgan)

Less Hope - 1 vote (ACS)

Still to vote - 2 (Funky, AFCFTW)



Is this still the case?

As i said mine is fixed as i begged the seer to come out and the seer did come out.... I put my vote right on and am still at 2pm 3/4 hours later seeing no real contradictory story... seer is dead = if true town lose anyway, if false i assume someone would have got the i was seer line out.


If this vote is accurate then for ME (i know i am innocent) there are 3 locked votes on Funky.

I presume there willl be two very obvious votes on Nev... this means bobby, AFC and GTE get tho decide the game.

Bobby is on Funky. if he stays it buys credibility but coudl be ploy.

GTE I took direction from and found references to Nev... or at least my mind told me this is what he was on about. Could be huge coincidence. therefore i am saying 75% innocent.. 25% brilliant game if wolf. so I again if switches he is wofl.

You too cannot BOTH be wolves.

If you are ACS has done a terrible job denying the accusation.

So.. worst case is a tie via AFC wandering in and voting Nev and one of you switching. that would put 4 on nev

If both die.

2 wolves remain and 3 town tomorrow after i presume the wolves kill.

if so then Town kills switcher and begs afc to vote. wolves kill someone.

then it will be 1v2 final day again

Basically At this point I cannot see the wolves winning provided the plan is correct.

Nev morgan me, all on FUNKY. I hope GTE as well. Thats 4.

If bobbyd is town he sticks, if he is wolf he sticks.... (thats what i'd do)

then we kill whoever is investigated. and found to be wolf.

Its simply down right now to backing Nev for win (for either side ) and finding actual wolves.

 

It's funny how they're not answering my questions do you not think? I've seen nothing other than one persons word that I'm a wolf. Feel free to question me fella, show me where I've tripped myself up because my primary accusers can't and won't.

 

And if you've played us this well my hat is off to you.

I'm off to do some work!

 

please log in to view this image

Fetch!!

 

Took one for the team. I expect a statue of myself to be erected in the middle of the town of we win.. Ideally not in my last known pose with a bite taken out my ass though

 

Still blanking my line of questioning then?

Who in their right mind would turn on your own villagers you asked. Obi I said. You've said nowt. Are you going to actually trip me up in some way or just using your 'word' You need to go through my posts and actually offer something.

 

And ignoring my questions still I see.

 

Good boy!!

please log in to view this image

Fetch again!

I'm off to do some work

 

Just like you little chum said who also wont answer me questions. You avoid offering anything at all while I point out where you're tripping yourself up.

 

FELLOW VILLAGERS! ASK YOURSELF WHY MY FIRST TWO ACCUSERS WON'T ANSWER MY QUESTIONS. ASK YOURSELF WHY THEY'VE OFFERED NO PROOF OF ME LYING. ASK YOURSELF WHY THEY BOTH HAVE GONE TO 'DO SOME WORK' AT EXACTLY THE SAME TIME INSTEAD OF EXPLAINING WHY THEY'RE TRIPPING THEMSELVES UP

I ALSO ASK YOU TO READ MY POSTS YOURSELF AND FIND MY LIES AND PLOTTING AS MY ACCUSERS CERTAINLY ARE NOT INTERESTED IN DOING SO. STITCH UP. GAME OVER TONIGHT UNLESS YOU INVESTIGATE THIS PROPERLY.

 

You seriously expecting me to bail you out without a good reason? I knew we should have got rid of a hairy mackem at the outset

Putting all history aside, this is the problem. You have no credible story at present. Less Hope has offered us something saying he is the seer. He has backed this up somewhat. It is tenuous but its still more than you have given. There is only really 3 questions to ask you:

1. Why did you defend ACS about the deleting of tags (which Nev is now claiming were scraps for villagers) Not a massive thing for me at the time or now but you are claiming you did not defend him when you blatantly did
2. Why have you not been posting much? Suddenly you are about to get lynched and you're all over it.
3. Why on earth do you support Sunderland?

 

Put your questions in one post for a start...

 

Likewise on both counts, I'll be back before 5

 

1. It didn't defend him, I pointed out the truth, it was more of a case of keeping Nev right, read it back where i defended him and not Albert. Already answered this but it was ignored by my accuser.
2. Do a count of posts. I've played more of a part than you. Fact.
3. Brought up too support Sunderland.

You've been quiet, you've voted for me off one persons word who's offered no proof and showed no example of me ever lying. If he really got information that I'm a wolf, he'd be able to use that knowlage to find discrepancies in my posts. He hasn't, yet you believe him. You're the third wolf aren't you?

 

Bottom line as I see it is as to whether you believe Less Than is the Seer or not.

If he is the Seer then he says he investigated you and found you howling in the moonlight. Not a question as to whether you tripped yourself up or not.

For me I do on the balance as I explained above feel he is the Seer and am therefore going along with his finding.

 

Ok, i'll prepare that this afternoon

 

To be fair that probably doesn't help your case either!!

#justsaying

 

Confirmed.

 

Thank you kindly. So it seem's I'm not the one 'confused' about the rules.