Off Topic Werewolves

Aw Feck.
I was pissed when I got in last neet and clean forgot.
Fair point.
Could he be a Zombie though?

Seriously.. who hasn't posted yet? Can anyone suss it out?

 

presume you mean you think this is also what was said? as runner of other games i dont want to start calling on your games master as its annoying to be drawn in but.... well lets discuss.

if there is a tie tonight do both die.

if you were werewolf you'd love to get a tie no? as long as you were not in it as a wolf of course

 

You are quoting a post from before the first lynching. At this stage we were all guessing.

 

You are acting extremely suspiciously MITO. Always wanting others to explain themselves but then putting in votes "to stir the pot". with no explanation as to your actions or reasoning. Care to explain your actions in a more detailed and logical manner?

The list you refer to above is right at the very start of the game when no-one had any information on others. My 3 choices were simply random choices at that time without any great logic or reason as there was absolutely no info available to me, not being a wolfie, to base the choices upon.

Now, as you say, what's your story?

 

And if at 7.59pm three wolves step out of line then we could potentially be left with three wolves left if we have got unlucky assigning who votes for who. It waould be too much guesswork for my liking.

 

Yes - Roland was very clear that in tie then all people in the tie will be lynched.

 

cos the doctor will then be prime target followed by the "known innocent"

hell the doctor could have protected himself last night

yes the game you suggest makes sense right up until the wolves kill 3 villagers by splitting up and voting for 3 separate people so all 3 die then they hit during night and we lose 4 players

that would be:

3 player v 5 players tomorrow potentially.

i think there are 12 left?

well know off 4 and that 8?

3 werewolves v 5 with one werewolf to die each night if we can agree as a 5.... but then theres the inactive part, the silly buggery and the of course i dont agree brigade thet wolves will inspire.

if they can simple get one more town to be lynched on any day then the town loses


your strategy on its own is fine but i reckon it can be got at so is risky.

OR they get their votes in now and just rely on someone messing it.... i've created a messy profile yesterday deliberately cos it is random and hard to know whats what day one. well i wont be carrying that on when there info to look at



you are still suspicious to me and my vote stands so if you want to play the game you way i can sit back and see

 

The Real Morgan Freeman
Alberts Chip Shop
Funky Dick
The Great Escape
Less Hope Than Neville
BobbyD
InBiscanWeTrust
ValleyGraduate12
ObiWan
MoreInjuredThanOwen
TastyMagpie - DEAD via werewolf
GeordieLassintheFen
AFCFTW
Tash - DEAD via lynch


this is the list?

12 left 3 of which are werewolves.

dr protected someone, perhaps themselves

OR

the wolves are biscan sneaky and chose not to kill.... can nyone state if the wolves have to kill or no

 

To stir the pot and to throw names into the melting pot being stirred and not shaken, I would be looking at

1. MITO for the point and reasons mentioned in my previous post. A bit too pushy and always demanding answers from others but then no proper logic to his voting. Also late vote change to make 3 way tie again for no reason.
2. Funky Pidgeon, he has floated in and out and not really given any concrete explanation to his voting.
3. GLIF. she came on late but didn't vote at all, possibly as vote was for two Villagers and one wolf and didn't vote as would have looked suspicious.

Any views or comments anyone wants to make on the above?

 

Be nothing sneaky about not killing someone when they could. Lol what is with these tags....

 

you are the one wanting people to talk, when i asked you to talk you promote me to top of the list... highly suspicious imo.

 

All fair points but only guesses. But worth making note of all the same.

I will add that others have been quiet or even silent.

AFCFTW - have we even heard from him?
BobbyD - a short, last minute appearance to avoid being voted off or genuinely at work? (I don't know his usual posting habits)
ACS - went very quiet at voting time (had voted for me early on in response to me voting for him)

To back up what you said GLITF's early quietness and then random postings and non-vote was suspicious.

Both MITO and IBWT seem to be suspicious with their postings but can they both be wolves as they are arguing?? (unless it is some very clever and mad scouse logic to throw the bizzies off the scent!)

 

Then it'd be onvious who the 3 are and they would only be able to kill a max of 3 people leaving 2 known innocents and at least 2 others meaning we can outnumber then

its t's risky and needs everyone on board though which is Prob why wouldn't work

 

AFCFTW

 

Not necessarily. We would assume randomly assign each of us to vote for one person. You are assuming that no wolves would be assigned to vote for a wolf. That would mean that each change of vote could protect a wolf. It would be entirely chance whether this happened or not and I don't like the idea of it being left up to chance.

 

My vote cast... Was too quiet for his usual self and last time he was quiet was 2 weeks ago when he was Mafia in our game.

normally if innocent he's accused 7 people within the first hour

 

if a wolf is assigned another wolf and doesn't vote for them, then surely that's an even bigger sign of guilt?

 

I still don't trust you (or MITO) yet but your logic on this one makes sense.

Until I hear a decent argument to go elsewhere I am going to put the pressure on him to speak up and join you with my vote...

 

AFCFTW

 

A clear sign of guilt that we could do nothing about if there were 3 wolves and only 2 villagers left!