And there in lies the problem. You're opinions don't have to differ just because you support different clubs. Me and Cini65 support rival clubs but both agree you're posts are nonsense.
Well we had Sherwood in charge the year before, and finished like 1 point behind them the year before that. We should have finished above them in 2012.
I refuse to believe you're 19. I'm a teacher and my year 9s put more logic into their thoughts than you are able to on here. Unless this is all a very elaborate windup and hoax.
Wow, you're a teacher? Feel sorry for those poor kids. Must be weird being smarter than your teacher.
Again, no way you're 19. The other thing I'd like to ask is how the entire spurs keeper and back 4 can be better than the arsenal one if you've conceded loads more goals than us this year...?
Sadly he could be 19. There's no doubt that the younger generation are increasingly dumbing down. He comes across as about 12 to you and me because that's how 12 year olds not 19 year olds acted before Facebook and Twitter.
He already dealt with that. Poch's first season. Next year that won't concede a single goal, Kane will score 100 goals and they'll win the world cup without even entering it....easily.
The two don't necessarily follow. Southampton have conceded the least goals in the division. Do they have the best 5 defensive players? I'd also point out that claiming that Arsenal's defence is better because they've conceded less, but that Kane isn't the best because he's scored the most goals is rather inconsistent. I'm not saying that either is wrong, but the arguments used are incompatible.
I agree they don't necessarily follow. If it was a genuine back five I'd go for Lloris, Bellerin, Koscielny, Vertonghen, Monreal If Southampton were included I'd go Lloris, Bellerin, Koscielny, Vertonghen, Bertrand Southamptons reduced conceded column is done to disciplined tactics, strong team work and two class DMs in front of them. But this is SpursMattH we're talking to here so there won't be much actual logic flying around.
You're 19 (allegedly) and you only have GCSEs to talk about... This might suggest you'll lose this battle given that for a good long while now, statistically more people take a-levels than don't
I'm particularly fond of your debating style which involves 'because they are' as your reasoning behind everything.
Alright, fine what did you get in your A-levels? I said GCSEs because not everyone takes A-levels. I personally got 9A*s and an A at GCSE and 3A*s and and A at A2. Maths, Further Maths, Physics and Chemistry too.
My education goes a little bit further than GCSEs lad. But qualifications aren't everything. Some people are smart in a logical sense as well. Unfortunately you seem to have neither. There's always McDonalds drive thru though, they always need fresh faced scamps.
Mate, I could get 700 out of 600 if I was making up **** like you on an internet forum. Standards have certainly slipped since I was at school. The div kids just used to do classes like woodwork and child development.
