CTWD was the biggest City fan group. If they wanted to appear to represent more fans than they did, it would've made little sense to voluntarily end a group with 2000 members and start a new one from scratch. The name was voted on by members, so again if the committee wanted a particular outcome, it'd have made little sense to put it to a vote. Once again your post is utter nonse. Once again your post is driven entirely by hatred for your fellow fan, just because we've dared to challenge the all powerful Allam regime. I'm sure I remember you weren't such a **** before your 'sabbatical'.
Strange, isn't it? His posts over the past 24 hours have been absolutely astounding in their fury, their lack of factual accuracy and their absence of logical reasoning.
I didn't say the trust was a single issue group. I said it was perceived as one. Both you and OLM seem to have missed the point that I'm making. The issues you hope to be involved in are generated by the comittee. A trust should be actively looking to find out what FANS want, and demonstrating to anyone looking in that they are representative. I think it also needs to show if it can be effective in working with the club,in representing fans, rather than being a campiagn group forcing the club's hand. I also think that replies to question from the trust don't need to be so dismissive or defensive. The trust is for fans, it should encourage questions and opinions. The trust needs to show how their actions are fan, rather than comittee driven, and which fan driven queries they plan to be involved in (name change excepted).
I think this is accurate, judging by what I've witnessed. People come and go. Those who find the name change unpalatable, that's their choice and if they decide to leave then thats sad, but it's their right, but to think it will make a difference over this issue is, in my opinion, incorrect. As for the 3000 who didn't renew, well in my opinion it is no coincidence that followed a significant hike in prices last Summer.
I didn't say he was. I merely said that we have fans like that who have the nerve to accuse others of intolerance.
That's 21 pages SO FAR of predominantly anti-Allam vitriol from the same vocal minority as usual. When are you going to learn and understand that the vast majority of fans couldn't care less about this name change proposal & are just happy to concentrate on watching and supporting their team? Cue more vitriol and abuse from the vocal minority!
The SMC is insolvent without the continuing financial support from Hull City Tigers Limited. The SMC's last accounts showed that the SMC debts were £6 million more than its assets. No wonder he wants to sell them debts to the Council for a quid. A valid question is, will a Labour Council bail out one of the Party's biggest individual donors?
It seems Meds got it about right yesterday... Andy Medcalf @AndyMedcalf Today's #hcafc news has flushed out a handful of Allam sycophants. And again no argument beyond "rich people can do whatever they want".
Because we wouldn't have a club, before the name change issue you'd have agreed with that but now you try and pretend what he did wasn't that great after all.
Sorry, where's the proof? What he did before the name change was good, since then he's shown what really he is: a lying, manipulative, arrogant, self centred, despicable sack of **** who needs to **** off.
You can claim those against a name change are in the minority as often as you like, it will never make it true.
