1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Will they, won't they?

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by originallambrettaman, Mar 31, 2015.

  1. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    112,561
    Likes Received:
    78,925
    FA still waiting on Hull City name-change application

    please log in to view this image


    THE Football Association continue to wait on Hull City's next move as the deadline for any proposed name change in time for the 2015-16 season looms tomorrow.

    The annual cut-off point for any club wishing to change its name is April 1 and, as yet, the governing body are still to receive notification that City owner Assem Allam will formally revive a bid to become Hull Tigers.

    A letter of intent, rather than a full application, is required to land at the FA's Wembley headquarters by the close of business tomorrow, or the club's playing name will remain as Hull City next season.

    No official comment on the long-running saga has come from the KC Stadium since March 16, when an arbitration tribunal set aside last April's decision to reject the club's original name change application.


    A legal team acting on behalf of City has since been in contact with their counterparts working for the FA, but the Mail understands neither a letter of intent nor a fresh application has yet been tabled.

    That will almost certainly change in the next 24 hours, though. Having fought the FA Council's rejection strenuously over the past six months, resulting in an arbitration ruling that the decision could no longer stand, there is an expectation that City will act before the deadline passes.

    Vice chairman Ehab Allam reiterated his belief last week that a name change was the "best thing for the club" and made it clear he wanted the original application to be reconsidered. The FA, in contrast, believe last year's application has been annulled by the arbitration verdict.

    Any application to be considered in time for the 2015-16 season would still need approval from the FA Council, with a vote likely to come at their monthly meeting in May. City lost the original hearing by 47 to 27 votes on April 9 last year.

    http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/FA-w...tory-26255197-detail/story.html#ixzz3Vx4POHxn
     
    #1
  2. Quill

    Quill Bastard

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    40,719
    Likes Received:
    13,318
    This should be a good 24 hours.

    EDIT: More like 14 hours now.
     
    #2
  3. Kempton

    Kempton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    24,472
    Likes Received:
    19,024
    Tick tock...
     
    #3
  4. Quill

    Quill Bastard

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    40,719
    Likes Received:
    13,318
    Does anyone else think having the deadline on April 1st is quite appropriate?
     
    #4
    GLP, greene and PLT like this.
  5. Evington

    Evington Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2014
    Messages:
    7,251
    Likes Received:
    5,391
    They definitely will
     
    #5
  6. ImperialTiger

    ImperialTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    7,700
    Likes Received:
    2,524
    Next attempted name change:

    Hull Tigers "The City AFC"
     
    #6

  7. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    27,468
    Likes Received:
    19,123
    Close of play tomorrow isn't it?
     
    #7
  8. Quill

    Quill Bastard

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    40,719
    Likes Received:
    13,318
    I have no idea to be honest, I'm too tired and hungover.
     
    #8
  9. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    112,561
    Likes Received:
    78,925
    It is by close of play tomorrow.
     
    #9
  10. Oregon Tiger

    Oregon Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,263
    Likes Received:
    1,173
    April 1st, April Fools' Day. What's the betting on an announcement that we have had a name change?
     
    #10
  11. Kempton

    Kempton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    24,472
    Likes Received:
    19,024
    That's not possible.
     
    #11
  12. Tuckin

    Tuckin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2011
    Messages:
    8,237
    Likes Received:
    2,794
    Anything goes on April Fools Day.

    Speaking of which, it's also of course the birthday of a City legend who has backed the name change...
     
    #12
    Kempton likes this.
  13. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    112,561
    Likes Received:
    78,925
    Maybe they'll announce it as an April Fools gag? <doh>
     
    #13
    Kempton likes this.
  14. Kempton

    Kempton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    24,472
    Likes Received:
    19,024
    Even i might back the name change to get the gig they've given Deano. But in private...
     
    #14
  15. SuitedandBooted

    SuitedandBooted Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    2,582
    Likes Received:
    465
    He hasn't backed the name change for any other reason than they're his bosses and he has to tow the party line, who can blame him? He's in a tough position, but he's a city legend, enough said!
     
    #15
  16. Ambraneri

    Ambraneri Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    317
    By the sounds of that article,HDM seem pretty sure the club will stick another application in.

    I think Assem Allam will let the deadline pass by and argue that his legal team are trying to force the FA into revisiting his original masterpiece of an application.

    Which could be his way of "dropping" the idea to save the remainder of his face he hasn't yet bitten off through spite.

    Either way,tomorrow should be fun.
     
    #16
    Sir Cheshire Ben and Kempton like this.
  17. John Ex Aberdeen now E.R.

    John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    23,035
    Likes Received:
    22,263
    I would have thought at the very least by now their lawyers would have sussed out whether the original application can legal stand. If not he either breaks his word again and does reapply, or as you say he uses the fact that they felt the original application stands, and they use it as a face saving exercise, and the whole thing dies a death.
     
    #17
  18. Muffinthegoat

    Muffinthegoat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,506
    Likes Received:
    1,713
    He has had plenty of opportunities to walk away from this and save face, he hasn't taken any.
     
    #18
    PLT likes this.
  19. John Ex Aberdeen now E.R.

    John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    23,035
    Likes Received:
    22,263
    What you say is right, but this time it is the last throw of the dice. If his lawyers can't make the original application stick, then he has to reapply which he said he will not do. So does he save face or lose face by reapplying?
     
    #19
  20. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    112,561
    Likes Received:
    78,925
    A fudge is the most likely outcome, he'll change the dates on the original application and re-submit it, claiming it's not a new application.
     
    #20
    PLT likes this.

Share This Page