The match reports I like are the ones you hear coming out of the ground or the ones discussed with my boys in the car going home. They are in parts inaccurate, in parts biased and are grammatically awful... but they are great because they are fresh. I like reading the views of our games by people on this forum... But after a day or so I am looking to the next game.
Free Speech in the dock again! Words are important and 9's only request to Swords was to be 'constructive'. 'Constructive' does not mean agreement or even nice but it does mean reasoned arguments, respect and dialogue. As Swords states, if Clive writes on social media, he must expect the rough with the smooth but it is not unreasonable for him to expect some respect too - especially from fellow QPR fans - (within reason and assuming Clive is not a delicate flower who will take umbrage unless every agrees with him and showers him with plaudits!).
No need to apologise mate, it should be me doing that. In hindsight it was it was poor judgement on my part to post those comments. I'm sorry that I did.
He said " ...and that bloke Kiwi can't even put the words QPR Podcast into a search engine and then press play" Dunno mate, why would I go out of my way to listen to a programme which the one time I did try it was terminally boring, just to hear someone I don't really rate have a pop at something I quite like? Perhaps Clive could try the same approach.
This post has all gone over my head. Who is this Clive bloke? Is he a fan who is also a journo? Why is swords not allowed to say bad things about him?
He was arguably the very best pure striker ever to play for us mate - 83 goals from 147 appearances. He shot so hard the officials missed a few too, the ball coming back out from the back stanchion into play so fast they didn't realise it had gone in.
