Dont wanna get into it but i cant see any need to wade into @The Relic like, bit out of order i thought
Nowt mate. Just thought you'd misread a post. Haven't had a drink in 3 weeks and now I'm either posting gobbledygook or getting caught up in handbags. Think I'll go back on the pop! Looking back at #59, I'n not putting words in his mouth but I think he's just hit out in frustration and you took the brunt of it. You're both top posters and hopefully tomorrow this will be ancient history. I'm off now to wind up my wife Just 5 days to go for a guinness it's gonna be a long 5 days!
Really? he says this to me And I'm out of order for responding by calling him a ****ing idiot? Are you for real?
How? By bringing up McClean's effect as a comparison? Because he had a go at me for not giving Advocaat a chance in his next comment, even though Dick has my backing one 100% and haven't made one single negative comment about him ever.
Read the conversation back, you've clearly upset the old fart and owe him an appolgy in my book, he said **** all to antagonise you
Do I ****, you'll be waiting a long time. I wasn't even aware of his age. it's of no relevance. If he's going to give me completely unwarranted and inappropriate(it was in no relation to the McCLean comment) attitude, talk down to me, use blasphemous comments and imply sentiment on my behalf then he's going to get back. All I've done is big up a youth player and got **** for it, so I gave some back. I don't have to pander to your demands anyway. If you don't like flex your little index finger and ban me. I'm off. Spater
This is a football forum and not a bloody bible convention...There are always going to be disagreements and fall outs, which in my opinion is half the fun of the forum...If apologies are given then fair enough, but I don't think any of us have the right to ask one poster to apologies to another..
I'm sure Funky and many others including myself have as well...However, i my opinion it should be done if the people involved think it is right to do so and not at the prompt of a third party..
This was my first post on this thread and I leave other people to judge where I went wrong : "I think Blunham's probably summed the whole thing up here. Every promoted kid who doesn't reach PL standard immediately brings us one place closer to 18th place. Having said that, I think we all agree on 'look where the seniors have got us'. I think, having lost yet another game yesterday, Watmore's going to get a chance pretty soon - we're getting close now to 'nowt to lose' time. So tell me the source of aggro please.
Nowt wrong with it being suggested (see above) mod/staff member or not i will back a poster up if i think its right, always did and always will, title aside
Can't wait to see Duncan get a game, was great to see him on the bench. Contrary to what most people say he isn't actually that fast off the ball, but is an incredible dribbler with insane balance and once he gets going is very hard to stop. Would like to see him work on his first touch slightly more and getting his head up when running but I'm sure he knows he needs to do this and it will come with experience. Also people saying he had a failed spell in Scotland are wide of the mark. The manager was raving about him every week at Hibs (might have been Terry Butcher) and teams were kicking lumps out of him to stop him. He got injured and struggled to make an impact after that.
Yes to which i replyed Nothing wrong with that, perfectly reasonable debate to which you got arsey harping in about Dick Advocaat when I hadn't even mentioned him, telling me I have to give him a chance and Goding me this and that. Was this not the order of postings? Those three quotes above are the order of our conversation if you're going to arsey with people you shouldn't turn into an abusive angry little man when they get arsey back, I don't care how old you are. Next one. Hardly calling you up and down am i? Infact i've not called you a single name, just responded in kind while you get your knickers in a twist defending someone I hadn't even mentioned. I still don't know what planet you're on as like I've made abundantly clear, I hadn't mentioned Advocaat. Your gripe is still a mystery to me. Or were you just angry because I would still like Watmore to get game time even though we've got a new manager. Is that really worth getting upset for? Am I aloud to mention Rees Greenwood's tallents or will that upset you too? Next, here comes the tirade of abuse Here's where I GIVE YOU ABUSE BACK, NOT FIRST, YOU DID THAT. Hardly the tirade I received was it? You're not getting an apology and I don't want one back and after this conversation is over it's done with me. Now for the pissed up little mod bitch. @Defoe in a row Have you read this post? You can see all the posts in order plus you may be sober by the time you read this and be able to work who abused who first. Did I do something other than debate on a forum which has debate in the logo? Or is it a case of because he's older, and in your eyes anyone who disagrees him is in the wrong? Because that's the impression you're giving me. First thing you reasoned was his age which I still do not know. One thing is for certain, this old man got arsey by for some strange reason to defend Advocaat from me when I hadn't even attacked him. Apologse? You can get ****ed, you don't tell me what to do, you think ticking my off like a child is going to make me conform? Or just make you look like power hungry little hitler who's trying to hold power. ****ing pathetic. Give your head a shake man
@Smug in Boots by the way fella. post #59 may be of interest to you. I thought he meant I'd abused Blunham and Smithy but he's since assured me he didn't mean me so he must have meant you. Unless of course he meant neither of us and was just in being a spineless little man singling you out for no reason instead of name dropping the person he actually has gripe with. Makes no sense at all I know mate. Basically Relic is claiming Blunham and Smithy have been abused by someone like me and you. I don't know if he means me or you or just doesn't have the stones to say who he really means
Here you are abusing people, including me, and obsessing over 'Smug' despite no Smug posts ....... is that what the board needs? As you seem to regard yourself as 'decent', please be decent and back up your claims about me ..... or are you a coward?
As far as I can see he's gone into one of his rages because he keeps starting arguments he always loses. If that requires 'Minxy's attention' then why doesn't he go crying to her ...... no doubt he often does I can't see why he's getting hysterical with you. He tried to 'bring me down' recently but skulked away when he failed, seems like he's festering badly. If I'm out of line I'm sure the board will say so, this 'forum enforcer' is nothing on here as far as I can see. If Blunham, Smithy etc feel I'm abusing them they can tell me without Mr Angry jumping in to defend them. They're big lads and never seem to hesitate to stand their ground. If they feel I'm out of order there's a 'report' button, not a 'Relic help me, I'm begging you' button. Tub-thumping 'decent people' who claim to 'stand for moral outrage, will always 'attract a few votes' but they're inevitably those who contribute very little and prefer to come on to whinge about others. He has a history of whining. They're inevitably tedious and destructive to the thing they're claiming to defend. His sort are always banging on about being decent but he'll never apologise and never admit he was wrong. I've seen dozens like him over the years.
