So, to summarise... - Chelsea are anti-football - Accusation that Man Utsd are anti-football are null and void because Man Utd have outscored Liverpool so must be a better footballing side - Chelsea have outscored Man Utd but that's only because they were playing better football earlier in the season - Man Utd playing better earlier in the season is irrelevant, they've outscored Liverpool ...gotcha
I thought you wanted the discussion to stick to Chelsea (despite bringing United into it). Be consistent!
I hate food waste, hate it I dip onto our cob vans that come to the office, I always say to them 'do not throw anything away that you dont sell. You have it for your tea or give it me' And since, they apparently (they could be lying, I dont have proof) have the homeless turning up at their shop and they give it to them
Agree. We ended up playing like United under LVG last night. No vertical passes just passing sideways and back to keeper. If our defending had it been better it would have worked, but we bottled it no excuses
You're just a plazzy manc and don't know the origin of the word. btw real mancs know that dippers are pickpockets and freegans are mancs using bins for food. But name calling won't change my original point that its ironic that you think Chelsea play anti football when the team you support are famous for it this season.
And still Shteve denying and deflecting that his matthlike logic and plasticity are preventing him from the reality of United's dire play and tactics this season. Never mind Shteve, rumour has it Ancelotti is next in line for the managers job at OT, his philosophy might be just what united need.