Chelsea were specialists in failure from 1905 to 2005 as they only won one title in that 100 years. chelsea would be nowhere without russian mafia bloodmoney. all FFP has done has prevented someone else from spending obscene amounts of money on a team to buy titles. no one likes chelsea as they are a club that has a racist **** as a captain, racist ****s as fans, and a self promoting **** as a manager, who gets his teams to play ****e park the bus football.
You were never ahead in the tie and scored your Second in the 87th minute, so you were in the tie for five minutes when you needed a third goal. If you think Bayern could not have destroyed you at home you are deluded. They did their job at the Emirates and rested players in the second leg and minds
You mean they gave you a tougher away game than we did at WHL?? Funny that, seeing as how we stuck 5 past you, and they didn't score one?...
I think those who are expecting Spurs to suffer under the financial pressure of the new stadium are forgetting the massive impact the new TV deal is going to have. Once foreign rights have been negotiated, the total is expected to reach around a staggering £8.5 BIL. These sort of numbers would mean the champions receiving around £150mil and even the bottom club, not far off £100mil. And that's just the TV money. Yes, £450mil is a fair chunk of change, but I don't believe that it's going to have the financial impact that some deluded Spamners, and others are hoping for.
What is all this Americanised "owned" bollocks? We're all replying to each others comments. If I disagree with something and I reply, it doesn't mean anyone has "owned" me. It just means you are talking bollocks and I'm correcting you. HTH.
Tricky, you do know why I put "owned" in inverted commas, don't you? No? Well, it was a term that was used by a Gooner (I forget which). And, yes, I agree that it is bollocks (like most of the stuff that Gooners on this site spout), which is why I place that word in inverted commas. It is quite an easy concept to grasp, if you take the time to think about it.
Its not just you HIAG. I'm seeing it more and more on these forums. This theory that anyone who replies to an outrageous or controversial comment has been caught out is a bit weird. Especially on a forum where the whole point is to discuss different opinions. NSIS can't help replying to every single thing I write. But I don't claim to be some kind of Robson Green master fisherman.
I specialise in "talking Bollocks" spotting. You stop talking it, and I'll stop pointing it out. How's that?
"Owning" someone is an art, Tricky. To "own" someone, you have to have a good and clever put-down. I'm forever "owning" PESKIE and various others. It gets to the point where I grow weary of it, to be honest. PESKIE and the likes of Gooner4 like to think that their pathetic retorts are "owning" comments, but they are, in reality, at the same level as "your mum stinks!"
I note that it's Arsenal v West Ham this weekend. Presumably, PESKIE and Gooner4 (the Chuckle Brothers) will put their money where their mouths are, and will predict a Spanners' win? If not, they are going to look like bigger clowns than they already are, given their assertion that the Spanners are making a power-shift on Spurs.
Come on, get your own posts. You've been hanging on Piskie's coattails for so long now you've decided to copy mine.
Is there a forum law against replying to someone in a similar manner to which they have posted ? I doubt it, You stated that Tricky is up my arse because he held a similar view on West Ham getting closer to Spurs ! Everytime HIAG posts his ****e you are on here supporting him irrespective of what WUM drivel he posts, hence I have said you are up his arse
