Ok, Muggins. Point out where you previously brought poverty and the abbility to buy a dvd, a woman's nationality, her age, or anything in the post above into the debate. You can't, because you didn't. Conclusion: you're still talking out of your arse, but the crap's starting to get a bit runnier...
were you dropped on a head as a child? How can you seriously include people who have no possibility of owning the book in a survey about owning a book? we'll just do the U.S. shall we? where this trash novel that so caught the womens sexual imagination exploded from. It has a very multi-racial society due to it's large influx of different cultures. It has roughly 130m adult(ish) women aged over 15 who have high, but not total, accessability to the book and the finances to pay for it. http://www.indexmundi.com/united_states/demographics_profile.html It has sold more than 45m copies there. I won't let you do the math because I have 0 confidence in your numeracy skills. It works out at more than 1 in 3 of the female population, 35-40% without taking away the 15-18 year olds, the illiterate, or the people too poor to buy it, which would raise that percentage higher, iliteracy being a particular problem in the U.S.. Should I mention the box office figures now?
Its only just occurred to me that in the tim I've had three not606ers confide in me via PM that they are homosexual. I thought nothing of it til now but now that I think of it, it does seem a bit odd? Has anyone else had such private information revealed to them by fellow posters?
There are an estimated 120,096 libraries of all kinds in the United States today. at maybe 4 copies a library there goes 1/2 a million copies have you read every book bought for you if you assume 1/2 were bought by hopeful husbands as presents there goes another 22 million copies book sales numbers mean nothing
Miggins Are you still following this post ? As i have a few questions i'd like to ask you regarding the Australia thing. I dont care nor doubt your comments about the 50 shades thing but i could rip that aprt too if you want.? Let me know and i'll post my queries. Thanks mate Q.
The most disingenuous comment you've made yet. You know what I meant but your inability to concede that people don't agree with you is just showing what an utterly conceited dickhead you are. Your welcome to your warped opinion, as it doesn't effect my life. At the end of the day I bet I and my partners have gained more pleasure from our action than you could ever understand. Go back to playing with you club and bone tools. EDIT: And when it come to stats, on there own they can give false impressions. That why they should only be used to back up first hand experience. Something, that when it comes to women, I seriously doubt you have ever meaningfully had. (A fumbled trip to a red light district doesn't count as can be said for pump me up Annie.)
You changing your stance again? every time someone shows you up for the tw@t you are, you come back with a different set of rules. Conclusion: you're STILL talking from your arse, but there's little solid evidence there now, just dribble...
Well, you regularly highlight anything that might be 'homosexual' as well as your puerile Brighton references. Maybe they see a repressed homosexual in you...
Maybe they do. Its phucking freaky though all the same. One is a MASSIVE fan and another one of them is the last person you'd expect to be gay, given their shall we say "ideological" adherence
You should read J Edgar Hoovers Bio. He persecuted U.S homosexuals for decades and in the end he was in the closet himself. Back to that old phrase, don't judge a book by it's cover eh.
