I would say the results are fairly conclusive and what most of us expected except possibly happy tiger although I doubt he believes most of his own bullshit anyway
I wonder why a true legend, who has the unique achievement of captaining the club in all 4 divisions, hasn't been appointed an ambassador? Is it because1- A) Mr Allam didn't ask him because he is too busy? B) He was approached but didn't want the role? C) He is against the name change?
Are you really that stupid? The results taken from a small sample on here and CI are exactly what I expected.
You do realise, Happs old chum, that you too are part of 'a small sample'? So, when you bluster about 'small minorities'......just think on.
Bluster? Pseudo intellectual, pretentious bollocks from you Stan? Surely not. Of course I'm in a minority on here. That's hardly news. No sense in being in denial about that. Offline and in the stadium though, totally different. You and your ilk are of course in denial about that.
I think this just about right. I would not have used unlawful, as I think this is about what is fair and reasonable and not what is against a law or rule. But that is being picky.
I know its not the first time I've said it, but I'd love to accompany you to an away game Happy and see you try and claim that the majority of our fans are name changers. I assume you were at Man City and noticed the 'We say No' chant on the concourse pre match? Was that a small minority?
Happy's already admitted that he doesn't do aways(other than Arsenal, which is closer than a home game for him and is an all-flasker anyway), so he hasn't witnessed the fact that our regular home and away supporters are vociferously and almost entirely anti-name change. You'll have to make allowances.