Support. Everything in the stadium, in the programme, communications has been rebranded despite the FA saying 'No'. Can you imagine the overkill if AA did get his way. The KC would resemble a friggin safari park.
We're currently in the position where the application is rejected. I don't see even the threat of sanctions being offered.
Aesthetically I actually think the 'new' badge is quite a good design - it's just the words 'HULL CITY AFC' away from being brilliant.
Not at all , the difference is the club is called Hull City and has always been called Hull City and fans are not asking for anything to be changed Allam wants to change the name and has already been rejected but didn't walk away as he promised
It would have been better just have had a tiger's head and no 1904, something put on because the owner is convinced we have been Hull City Tigers since 1904.
Do us men...what? Yes, I'm disappointed in you CC, you've previously set such high standards. So, I was right, then judging by the responses in this. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, except in all of your worlds, seems more do as I say, not as I do. Hypocrisy and arrogance.
I realise you're a little hard of thinking but even for you, this is a display of utter stupidity. He said he'd walk away once the entire process was exhausted. It isn't yet.
We implore the magnificent fans of Hull City to unite together in support of Steve Bruce and the team as we strive to retain Premier League football in Hull. That made me laugh. Magnificent my arse.
Started on the sauce already eh? Let me make it easy for you then, so you can join in. 1. Club loses appeal, they are expected to apologise to the protesters, drop it and move on. 2. Club wins appeal, the protesters are not expected to apologise, drop it, or move on. When after insisting on 1 above, the protesters should in fact, apologise, drop their opposition and move on. That's treating someone else as you expect them to treat you. HTH. UTT
It doesn't state any specifics in the FA rules, it just says they have 'complete discretion' as to how they arrive at their final decision. Premier League rules specifically state that fans need to be consulted on such matters, but not the FA.
I think his argument is that the FA didn't consult fans on previous applications and they set the precedent. The fact those previous applications were rejected at very early stages in the process seems to have passed him by.
There haven't been any similar applications. The ones that have been referred to are not the same as his ridiculous idea.
They were name change applications. The reasons for the change may be disimilar, but they were an application for the self and same thing...well, they wanted a different name like, but you know what I mean.
