1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Off Topic Cockneys V Scousers

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by Chazz Rheinhold, Jan 27, 2015.

  1. Happy Tiger

    Happy Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,983
    Likes Received:
    7,363
    And yet still not inure them in any way?
     
    #81
  2. GLP

    GLP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    30,014
    Likes Received:
    27,880
    The intent was there, he could have, it should have been a straight red. In the same way players raise hands or head butt.

    No need to reply - you're wrong.
     
    #82
  3. Charon

    Charon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    7,289
    Likes Received:
    8,867
    correct - you don't have to injure someone - Ramirez 'touched' Vertongen and got sent off
     
    #83
  4. Happy Tiger

    Happy Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,983
    Likes Received:
    7,363
    Rightyo sunshine. :emoticon-0127-lipss

    So you think anything that shows intent should be red carded, and if it was missed/ignored by the ref the FA should take action after the game. So you think Skrtel and Gerrard should be up before the FA alongside Costa from that game too as they both got away with actions that ordinarily, would, by the rule of law, meaning a red card for each of them and the 3 game ban.

    This witch hunt you're keen on would mean after each game, a panel sitting for every game in the PL, and having retrospective bans dished out for players almost injuring others.

    Would make team selections fun wouldn't it? :emoticon-0136-giggl

    Actually, now you mention it, that might work in our favour as teams above us would end up losing some of their better players hopefully. :emoticon-0137-clapp
     
    #84
  5. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,739
    Likes Received:
    76,269
    Stamping on a player is a red card, the ref missed it, so retrospective action is being taken.

    It's not complicated.
     
    #85
    Mr. Hat 6.3 recurring and PLT like this.
  6. Happy Tiger

    Happy Tiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    15,983
    Likes Received:
    7,363
    So is going in with your head to another player.

    That's not complicated either but it was missed/ignored and nothing is being done about it, because there's no witch hunt against Stevie G.
     
    #86
  7. Charon

    Charon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    7,289
    Likes Received:
    8,867
    that's because the ref
    that's because the ref saw it and booked him - you don't seem to understand simple concepts do you - do you wake up in the morning and think 'how can I act like a **** today?'
     
    #87
  8. CityCalv

    CityCalv Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,767
    Likes Received:
    215
    Which is why I said retrospective bans should be put in place.
     
    #88
  9. GLP

    GLP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    30,014
    Likes Received:
    27,880
    I'm not on a witch hunt, it's the laws of the game. Something you seem quite oblivious too. You are a ****ing irritating ****. You should change your name from 'Happy Tiger' to 'Thrush'.
     
    #89
  10. Charon

    Charon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2013
    Messages:
    7,289
    Likes Received:
    8,867
    as in Happy CLAPper
     
    #90

  11. Amin Arrears

    Amin Arrears Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    38,490
    Likes Received:
    19,901
    Why would anybody be be on a witch hunt for stevie g?
     
    #91
  12. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,739
    Likes Received:
    76,269
    Happy Tiger gets it wrong shocker...
     
    #92
  13. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,739
    Likes Received:
    76,269
    Three game ban...

    Diego Costa will serve a three-match suspension with immediate effect after a charge of violent conduct against him was found proven by an Independent Regulatory Commission on Friday 30 January 2015.

    The Chelsea forward had denied the charge in relation to an on-field incident involving Liverpool’s Emre Can which occurred in the 12th minute of the League Cup semi-final second leg at Stamford Bridge on Tuesday 27 January 2015.

    The incident was not seen by the match officials but caught on video.

    http://www.thefa.com/news/governance/2015/jan/diego-costa-banned#28TQXeWwfHpoW4dt.99
     
    #93
  14. spesupersydera

    spesupersydera Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2014
    Messages:
    10,507
    Likes Received:
    10,616
    Let's hope he's the first of a few, if not, as 'appy says, it's gonna appear like a anti-Chelsea witch hunt. Chelsea seem to be the only one's with a bad rep for diving (which is certainly bollox) + had Mourinho done to Wenger what he had done to him, he'd still be serving a touchline ban !
     
    #94
    Happy Tiger likes this.

Share This Page