That dozy wum London's EC brought it up, I was just correcting him and HIAG, you are Plum, but it says a lot about your criteria for 'owning' somebody. I can see now why you have deluded yourself into thinking you have owned me. Who knows, maybe in another dimension you are actually quite good at wumming, but unfortunately in this one, you are **** at it.
You should probably walk away HIAG. You're out of your depth. Chelsea Arsenal spuds West Ham Palace QPR ^^^^^^^ This is the order the London clubs will finish in BTW. West Ham could swap places with the spuds, but that will probably have to wait for another season or two.
HIAG can't help himself. Like I said, he is like one of those **** Boxers who vastly overestimate their abilities. They engage in **** talk before the fight about how they are going to destroy their opponent and then go down like a sack of spuds in the 1st round. The difference though is that most of these chumps know when they've been rinsed. HIAG though just keeps coming back for more and more punishment and never learns.
But you always come across as the angry humourless bitter one http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30896253 • 7. Chelsea: 387.9m (303.4m) • 8. Arsenal: 359.3m (284.3)
PESKIE doesn't get sophisticated wummery, EC. He is very much of the common-or-garden wum variety. After a very short while, one grows bored with pummeling the chump, as there is very little sport to be had in it.
You need to take that up with Companies House, because their figures don't tally with those that you're peddling While you're at it, you might want to check how Chelsea's £998m debt is coming along
That's becasue So we should believe PISKIE and his three-month old, out-of-date story about 2012/13 revenues over Deloitte figures for 2013/14 when we are discussing 2013/14 revenues. Poor Piskie can't keep up
You are a tool HIAG. You've just copied my pummelling the chump boxer quip and tried to pass it off as your own when everybody can still see my original quote on the screen. And in the same breath you're trying to talk about sophisticated wummery. Such a massive fail. You couldn't make this **** up.
C Companies House figures. Take it up with them. Are you disputing Chelsea's £998m debt ? As for keeping up, there's a whole thread where you've been rinsed for being out of date with Man Utd figures
Ah, bless! I was merely using turns of phrase that you seem to understand. Sweaty old boxers lumbering around a flea-bitten ring is clearly a level that you are comfortable with, rather than all that quantum field theory stuff that, as we all found, is way beyond you.
Saying that to PESKIE is like telling the Pope to stop taking Mass. You're flogging a very dead and very stupid horse, EC. Trust me on this.
CLUB STATEMENT ON FINANCE Posted on: Wed 19 May 2010 Chelsea Football Club has released a statement today (Wednesday) following media stories on club finance. The statement reads: 'Contrary to media reports today, other than a small residual balance Chelsea Football Club and our parent company Chelsea FC plc are debt free and do not owe any money to our shareholder (Fordstam Ltd). Neither do we owe any money to Roman Abramovich. Jealousy
Nice try HIAG, but I had to school you about multiverse being theoretically possible outside of just string theory. Also the boxer reference is describing you. Inferior to your opponent, yet you give it the big talk only to get sparked in the first round. Everybody else can see it coming apart from the poor deluded chump taking the beating. The only difference is you keep coming back for more. Maybe in a parallel dimension you are a champ, in this one you are a chump
