I no longer rise to the bait, he's a WUM of the highest order.
He's worse than a wum,but I do like playing with him.
I no longer rise to the bait, he's a WUM of the highest order.
He's worse than a wum,but I do like playing with him.
As they say.

All you have to see is where we were and how we played for a season and a half under laudrup..we were dire and slipping down the league faster than any other team that eventually saw us just 2 points from joining the bottom 3. Now if that is what you call good management i feel sorry for you.. we sacked him because he was not cutting the mustard and lucky we did with the way sunderland and palace found form at the death or we were certain relegation fodder. There is no dispute about it as it's all on record, The only mistake we made was that he should have been sacked much earlier like any other club would have done..![]()
Last season, under Monk, we secured 18pts from 14 games. An average of 1.286 per game
This season, we have secured 30pts from 22 games. An average of 1.364 per game.
If the first three games of this season are excluded - please bear with me, I recognise the argument that they should not - then we have gained 21pts from 19 games (half a season). An average of 1.105 per game.
So, in overall terms so far this season, we are ahead of last year's average under Monk. However, the return for the last 19 games is lower, so it appears than we are trending down.
Surely, having secured 30pts two months earlier than last season, we should be good enough to avoid a relegation dogfight?
That said, how we finish over the last 16 PL matches will go a long way towards indicating whether Huw and the Board will have a big decision to make over the close season.
If we finish well, I expect that GM will get the green light to continue - but if we merely crawl over the safety line, then a hard assessment of how we proceed will need to be undertaken.![]()
Facts are facts dear boy. you cant change them however much you try to ignore them...end of story we might as well put this to bed now...The only thing "dire" around here is you and your moronic posts. Go take a hike you "baffoon".

Of course,the Monk followers don't want to compare Laudrup's first season,with Monk's first full season. Why?
Because Monk is not going to emulate it. Simples.
Now,as I see it,the Laudrup/Monk debate,if that's what it is,has been created by Monk follower's kicking **** out of Laudrup for longer than I care to remember.
There was NO acceptance of HIS achievements,and some are still vehemently pouring poison on his name and memory.
Where was the Assessment of Laudrup thread? One was created to provide a place of Monk worship.Why? What was worthy of worship?
It was more than premature,it was obscene.
I really hate injustice,and that's what fuels my defence of Laudrup.
He deserves better treatment than that constantly dished out by a bunch of losers.
"We were a shadow of our glory year....." Can't argue with that,and I could see why he ended up losing his job.
What we don't know, is how much influence some of the players had in getting him the sack.
Facts are facts dear boy. you cant change them however much you try to ignore them...end of story we might as well put this to bed now...![]()
yes playing the swansea way for the first half of the season where we won our first trophy but what happend to the rest of the season and a half, we were dire and hardly won a game. I would not credit laudrup with our first 6 months as he admitted he did not know where swansea was and he certainly did not know any of the players except De-guz. It was curt and the senior coaches who picked the team and set the game plan in laudrups early days. Why did it all go pear shape the minute he started to run things his way that effected the whole set up of the club let alone on the pitch. what happened over night. ..No he was useless from day one and should never have been appointed. Im glad we got rid but im sorry it was not sooner....Dai, we played our best football under ML during his first season in charge.



Dai, we played our best football under ML during his first season in charge.
yes playing the swansea way for the first half of the season where we won our first trophy but what happend to the rest of the season and a half, we were dire and hardly won a game. I would not credit laudrup with our first 6 months as he admitted he did not know where swansea was and he certainly did not know any of the players except De-guz. It was curt and the senior coaches who picked the team and set the game plan in laudrups early days. Why did it all go pear shape the minute he started to run things his way that effected the whole set up of the club let alone on the pitch. what happened over night. ..No he was useless from day one and should never have been appointed. Im glad we got rid but im sorry it was not sooner....
I did a football coaching course with 2 ex-Swansea coaches (who had been involved for years and are still in touch with goings on at the club....when they finished the course they played a video of the Swans (to give an example of "what we are all aiming for and what we can achieve by coaching players the right way").
One particular passing movement was highlighted as the pinnacle of Swansea's football and it was stated that all involved with Swansea can be proud.
Guess who's team it was they were talking about and was exclusively used in this video?
Hernandez, to Michu, back to Leon, out to Ben, into Ash, to Chico, up to De Guzman, Routledge, Michu.....Goaaaaallll.
****ing hell bring back Curt that's what I say
Oh yeah, he's still there isn't hePerhaps Monk should either let him coach and pick the team or try listening to him once in a while
What a prize cock you are Dai Twp![]()
![]()
![]()

There are hundreds of crap coaches through the revolving doors of the club, too many to wast my time talking about, some went to west end some to Pontardawe, some to Llanelli, etc etc, real prize lemons, I'm amazed they were connected to our club, perhaps they were training the girls teams...![]()