This cropped up the other day and is a bit of a non-argument in my opinion. Two of the first 3 games were at home to Burnley and West Brom. Those are games we would "expect" to win - it doesn't matter whether you play them at the beginning of the season, the middle or the end. To take them out of the equation just distorts the stats thereafter for whatever point you're trying to prove.
Monk has now been in charge for 36 Premier League games. His record is W13, D9, L14 = 48 points. With two games left to complete the 'equivalent' of a full season, there's a decent chance he will amass 50 points. I defy anyone on here to say that is not a bloody good effort. Libertarian will say it's not a complete season and therefore doesn't count, blah, blah, blah.
50 points is better than Rodgers or Laudrup managed in a full season in the Premier League. With regards not seeing any progress, his points per game this season is better than last (1.36 v. 1.28) which would suggest he has made personal progress. Whether you consider the club as a whole has made any progress is up for debate, but I would suggest it certainly hasn't got any worse (it depends, I suppose what criteria you want to use).
"Libertarian will say it's not a complete season and therefore doesn't count".
Who the hell do you think you are to announce to the world what I will,or won't say?
At the risk of stealing cartoon's plunder, - do you have "a hard on for me"?
Actually,your carefully produced stats "don't count", since they span two different seasons.
Final league placings are not created from such flawed calculations.
If they were,then teams could add their last season's cup wins with this season's,and make out they have won the cup.
You simply cannot wait to heap praise on Monk's shoulders before he has actually earned any.
It's a great shame that you feel unable to do likewise for Laudrup,who did actually win/achieve something.


