Correct! But only for the eight fold, it still paid out £616 for the fivefold though so you could say I'm not too shabby
You've already been owned on that particular issue, mate, as Spurs Disciple proved on another thread. Haven't you got a cupboard to be getting back to? Don't leave your shreddies on the stairs, now.
Your latest prediction HIAG was that Arsenal were '****ed' because city had Aguero and Kompany back. How did that prediction turn out for you ? And you have a litany of previous crap predictions about Arsenal's demise and Spurs overtaking them that have come back to haunt you time and again.
To be fair, that whole "North London Power-Shift" stuff came from a Gooner. I merely picked up the ball and ran with it.
At least he had the sense to ditch it when it was obvious. You on the other hand desperately cling to it and wheel it out again and again, even though it means you get shot down time after time. You remind me of one of those unfit, overweight and sub standard boxers, who talk endlessly about destroying the opponent, only to go down like a sack of spuds in the 1st round. But unlike most of those chumps who disappear into the background, you keep coming back for more and more punishment
You make the mistake of trying to shoot the messenger, PESKIE. I predict nothing; I merely posit questions for debate. Your intensely defensive attitude towards the whole "North London Power-Shift" debate belies a certain degree of desperation and, it must be said, immaturity.
You lecturing me on immaturity is an irony. Also you have made numerous claims and predictions that have come back to haunt you. You even admitted that with your now infamous quote: 'I know many of my comments have come back to haunt me' And I think we all know where the desperation about the 'north london power shift' lies. You wheel it out endlessly in the hope that one day it might happen, but each time you end up with egg on your face.
If the Spuds finished 2nd, Arsenal would find a way to win the league *just* to not finish below the Yids. It's a fact of life, a mathematical certainty that Arsenal will finish about Spurs no matter what.
I should look up the meaning of mathematical certainty... And all this affects you spammers how, exactly?....
Like I said, the numpty who first mentioned the North london power shift quickly deserted it when he realised it was a pile ****. You however still churn it out today, desperately clinging to it like a tagnut attached to a cats arse. Not only that, but you still continue to talk **** about Arsenal and predict our demise, even though you are rinsed, spun and hung out to dry time and time again. Only yesterday you were talking about Arsenal being '****ed' ahead of the City game and claiming that we were vying to be London's 3rd best club. And one again you humiliated yourself.
My debates and arguments are like quantum fields, PESKIE, in that they don't really exist as arguments (as such), but merely create the potential for other arguments to come into existence and to interact with one another. When you get wound up by what I say, it's not really me who you are angry at, but yourself. The quantum field exists only as potential, PESKIE; it has no physical properties of its own. Do you see what I am saying to you?
I would say that your debates and arguments are more akin to the quantum mechanics of Schrödinger's cat. From the outside they appear to be badly thought out wum attempts that are bound to fail, but on the inside they could just be you actually believing the **** you write. As there is no way of telling until you have opened the box, which kills the comment. (Me slapping you back into place) you can only reasonably assume that your comments are both Doomed to fail wum attempts and you that you actually believe the **** you write.
Your reply was, surprisingly, intelligent, PESKIE. It does, of course, have a flaw, one that is fatal to your argument. The whole point of the Schrödinger's cat analogy is that the box is never opened, leaving open the possibility that the cat is both alive and dead. It is used to express a very complex principle of quantum mechanics. Nonetheless, I will give you credit for attempting to construct an intellectual riposte, even if you don't quite manage to pull it off; it's far superior to the banal and immature wums that you generally go in for. So, well done!
i prefer the "many worlds" interpretation of this paradox. Whereby the cat is both dead and alive regardless of wether the box is opened - but the alive and dead cats are in different branches of the universe that are equally real but unable to interact with each other. using quantum mechanics we could argue that there is a trophy cabinet in White Hart Lane that contains all the trophies that you have won and in another part of the universe there is a trophy cabinet that contains all the trophies that you COULD have won, both realities are equally distant from each other and equally real. To most observers only one cabinet exists but to some observers both exist. HIAG believes there is a third cabinet that contains all the trophies that you WILL win
