He's probably getting on in years himself considering GMC was about 187. Credit where it's due for learning how to use a computer at his age.
Cym is like Nosferatu, the undead. He might look like he's an old fart, but if you knew his real age, he would look like a young man to you.
Like I said, it suits the Chavs and City now, because it means that no other clubs can buy their trophies. The Chavs were allowed a decade of financial doping, in which they spent nearly £1bn on the squad. So yes FFP does suit the Chavs now, and it came in to force exactly because of their 'half cheating' behaviour. But make no mistake, it is Jose + £££ = success. Without the £ he wouldn't even be at Chelsea, because he only goes to clubs where the chairman gives him a blank chequebook.
Unaio de leira Porto Inter treble on smaller spend and wages than Arsenal You probably didn't like football then but Chelsea higher revenue than Arsenal pre Roman, 1996-2002. Eg: 2001/2. Chelsea £143m, Arsenal £141m
Chelsea would still be a two bit yo-yo club without Roman's rubles and Jose would be milking some other fat cat in Europe somewhere. Anyway, this thread is about Arsenal fans who back Wenger, or not. So let's keep Special case to another thread
Not at all. The only thing you chavs have proved is that without the cash, you're on a par with Millwall. EC's quote about revenue sums it up perfectly, in 01/02 we had less revenue than you and we won the double. Whereas you won **** all and needed a decade of Roman's financial doping to achieve the double.
That just proves my point further. Even when you had a bigger revenue we still had a better team and manager. You needed Roman to come and Juice you to the tune of £1bn to catch up with us.
Not really, proves that money can be pointless, and teams can be **** with or without it. Like Arsenal, have money.....**** hehe
Not really. We haven't had any cash for the last decade and still kept up a challenge. Whereas you were **** until Roman came and juiced you. Furthermore, without the Rubles you would have gone down the chute like Leeds. When Ken Bates sold Chelsea, you were £80m in debt and weeks away from administration. Chelsea only exist because the Sugar Daddy came and bailed you out.
There is no doubt that the special one would have delivered trophies on Arsene's budget in the pasr Your wage bill has overtaken ours this season for the first time in a decade, but we are still juicing you. What's your excuse for Wenger now?
Utter crap. Maureen would have gone cap in hand to another sugar daddy after a decade of no money to spend. Alan Sugar might be spud, but he got it right when he said 'I'd like to see how bloody special he is down at Leyton Orient'. Maureen without the cheque book is just another nobody. Also our wage bill incorporates the whole of the club, that's every employee. We don't make public anybody's individual wage. But I'd bet that players like Hazard, Costa, Oscar, Fabregas etc are paid way more than any player at Arsenal.
Jose was special at Unaio de Leiria, a club smaller than Orient, taking them into a CL spot. He won CL at Inter on two-thirds of Arsene's budget with Pandev and Milito up top, and with Porto on a fifth of Arsene's budget too
£10m net spend and smaller wage bill than Arsenal this season: top of the league. What is AW's excuse now?
