How about the hundreds of people who saw the plane approach and strike the Pentagon? As for Flight 93, the passengers were on the phone with their loved ones before they assailed the terrorists. They were on record as to their plan once they learned of the other hijackings, and realized theit plane too was to be used as a weapon. Tell the wife of the guy who organized the assault that they were shot out of the sky, she lives about 2 miles from me. She knew what he was going to do.
Maybe but my bets are he has ****ed with every known condom on, including his very own tin foil versions, which are sold under the headline, "warning, metal might not be good for you" but a good haircut is.. Careful Terry btw, them NK boys are watching us..
Can anybody help me out here and answer this one for me please? However, daft as it all is, I must now admit something. The film-makers do raise one legitimate question. It concerns WTC-7, the third tower that collapsed that day - still a little-known event - seven hours after the first two, apparently as a result of fire and debris damage. But it had not been struck by a plane. How exactly could that fall down?
Aye, but the 47 story building collapse in near free fall speed straight down… How does that happen then?
Building 7 was neither hit by an airplane nor, apparently, by heavy fallout from the collapse of either of the Twin Towers. If you believe the official story that it collapsed from fires, it would be the first case in history in which fires induced the total collapse of a steel-framed building. Shouldn't that have been newsworthy, given its implications for building safety and rescue and firefighting operations? Incredibly, it is difficult to find any mention of Building 7 in newspapers, magazines, or broadcast media reports about the September 11th attack. The collapse of Building 7 was reported on 9/11/2001, apparently by all or most of the television networks. These reports were so obscure that it was not until 2007 that researchers discovered that the BBC and CNN had announced the collapse before it occurred. Despite the enormity of this event, there is no mention of it in a timetable of press flashes, alerts, and bulletins from the day of and after the attack compiled by theAssociated Press.
Read this about the Madrid building fire and then think about the comparables to the world trade centre and building 7 which they say was as a result of Fire http://www.mace.manchester.ac.uk/pr...Study/HistoricFires/BuildingFires/default.htm
Maybe if they stack floor to floor a shed load of explosives they can give us a right bang of a result..
or another damp squib,some of them need a rocket up the ring box but gus needs to light a fuse soon before the milk bottle falls over
Well they can definitely see the future… Maybe it just the yanks that don't know how to build skyscrapers then…
^^^^^^^^ What most likely, logically happened: While investigating and updating information on the collapse of the towers, someone at the BBC was given a report/press release that building 7 was going to collapse.
Yawn yawn yawn. Sometime, just sometimes, a spade is just a spade. Sometimes, just sometimes, a terrorist attack is just a terrorist attack.
If anything I said was out of order then I apologise.. I have mixed water with you for a long time and I think the world of ya mate. I was only here for the moon stuff but as usual, I do the universe.. The best as always..
