Those security cameras were certainly not designed to repel an attack from the air and so will have been solely focused on detecting potential attackers approaching from the ground..
Sorry mate, but the neo Muslim extremism revolution started with Iran overthrowing the Shah and forcing the countries residents to live under strict Islamic laws. If you are looking for a logical explanation for the beginnings of the current terrorism, then this is it..
Who controls the present controls the past. Who controls the past controls the future. Eric Arthur Blair.
The thing with conspiracy theories is, you never really get them confirmed, so for me all it brings on is frustration. One thing I learned whilst working for GCHQ is how to spot a steaming pile of **** from 20 miles away, a rule of thumb is that if it's on YouTube for any significant period of time, it's a steaming pile of ****.
Did you hear about the nasa live stream onto the space station which apparently picked up a large ufo, this month, was removed and deleted instantly, there was a still of it for about an hour then that went aswell
Nay pal, never seen it. The UFO stuff is a different kettle of fish for me, I firmly believe there's no chance we're alone and there's no chance we are the most advanced of all the species in the Universe. I bet if one landed in North Korea that Kim Jong Un would probably get in it and try to fly it.
Haha Found a still http://m.chron.com/news/strange-wei...cuts-out-after-alien-UFO-sighting-6009944.php
What a heap of ****. Over 3000 people lost their lives when planes smashed into the Twin Towers, thousands of witnesses seen it happen. I don't believe for a second it was 'staged' and it's downright disrespectful to say so.
The government couldn't (a) organise something like that and (b) keep it a secret, so it's a pile of poop as far as I'm concerned. They already wanted Bin Laden dead for attacks in Africa and certainly didn't need another reason to do it.
America doesn't source oil from Iraq, nor did they, or anybody else for that matter, take any of it during the time western forces occupied Baghdad and Basrah. Their refinery infrastructure wouldn't have allowed for it even if they did want to take it. Having said that, yeah, they went for oil, or more to the point, to stop S.Hussein selling his oil in a currency other than the USD. As for WMD, there were no nuclear warheads located, as expected, nobody thought they'd have anything like that, yet when people think WMD they think 'atomic bomb'. What allied forces did recover during their occupation of both cities, was plenty of nerve agent, known to contain the deadly compound Sarin. Not massive amounts granted, but it's by no means unthinkable that the weapons were redistributed. The same compound was used by Assad forces recently on his own people.
One thing that really stinks for me about 9/11 is the attack on the pentagon. I just cant believe that a plan hit it. Only cctv is a toll point camera that snaps every couple of seconds. That building would have cctv cameras covering every inch inside and out and if a plane hit we'd have all seen it. I also imagine that the fact 2 planes had hit new york and they knew others had been hijacked theyd have been on high alert. Also dont believe that the pentagon, Whitehouse etc dont have anti air defence weaponary. Flight 93 also smells fishy to me. Reckon they shot it out of the sky and made up the romantic hero story about the passengers overpowering the terrorists and bringing it down.
They reckon the 9/11 stuff was military planes to look like airliners, the real passengers were siphoned off somewhere and never seen again, probably to that tiny pacific island aka a US military base that no doubt hides the Malaysian plane that went missing last year or maybe hmmmm.. The moon landings is my thing though, as a photographer I can honestly say that not one shot Nasa released in 69, was not backlit, had studio side lighting and use of props. Thats my only gripe mind, not the fact that they travelled all those miles in a tin foil capsule, with about 2kb of computerised data, through radiation belts and managed to land on a rather damp moon with no rocket thrust crater. JFK said it would happen and it fekkin did, good on ya man..
Several intel buildings in the UK have 'cctv cameras covering every inch' but there is no way in hell the media would ever be privy to the footage they capture, regardless of whether the public has a thirst for information or not, even if the imagery was completely irrelevant. The fact is, the moment you release imagery of a secure compound, the security of it becomes compromised. If for example building A was part of a 300 acre site, whereby the public were not permitted entry, then building A was hit by a missile, why would footage be released showing the missile, when it could compromise the security of the site. There's a reason the public aren't allowed into the site and not just the building.
If it was today, you know Kim Jong Un would have his best photo-shoppers on the job proving he went without his helmet on. please log in to view this image
