Why do you think Monaco let him go to you lot? Because he's a crock who is past his best. If he was the Falcao that they paid 50m for, he wouldn't be going anywhere. No brainer.
Their owner refused to pay FFP fines so they had to get his wages off the books. It's well documented and very simple to understand.
You seem to have confused yourself. You said that Monaco sent him out on loan because he's a crock. That's factually incorrect (unless I'm mistaken and in between writing bollocks on Internet forums you oversee Monaco's transfer dealings). It's documented that Monaco encountered FFP problems as they spent big before the rules were enforced and now can't comply with FFP and unlike the owners of PSG, the owner of Monaco refused to pay any fines. Those are the facts. Anything else is just conjecture from a thick Chav.
My point is that if he was the player be once was then Monaco migjt have offloaded others instead. Thick c**t.
Not sure many others were on his salary. It's really not difficult to understand. You're allowing your bias to cloud your logic and are subsequently presenting yourself as a thick Chav.
Bias? Nothing to do with bias. You however refuse to acknowledge what everyone else knows. He ain't what he was. Sad but true. You continue to portray yourself as a thick c**t.
So in 1 injury hit season, you believe he's lost all his ability. I think it's too early to say, he didn't do to badly over Xmas with a run in the side, he got a couple of goals away from home. I think he's improving
As I've said, you seem to be confusing yourself. At no point have I said he's still the same player as he was prior to his injury. Luckily for you, you can re read the thread and pinpoint where you went wrong.
And yet again you miss the point. Granted FFP was the main reason but if he was the player he was then I don't think Monaco would have offloaded him. I don't have access to their wage bill but I think they would have got rid of others before him.
