Should the BBC be offering itself as a platform for commentators, politicians, senior police officers, bloggers & others to highlight the "moral wrongs" of Ched Evans returning to his profession & as such contributing to Evans' "trial by social media" Should the BBC be impairing Evans' efforts to rehabilitate & integrate himself whilst also offering King, not only an apology for editing out one of his songs from an edition of TOTP, but also an opportunity to contribute in a major documentary, to be aired on BBC2?. Do they (the BBC & King) not know or understand what child abuse is, what affect this may have on his victims & how victims of child abuse may feel about his inclusion? He hasn't acknowledged or shown any remorse to his victims or for his actions. He has always maintained his innocence of the charges he was found guilty of, even after they were upheld at an appeal. Just asking.
The BBC have, over the past few days, introduced a policy whereby Ched Evans cannot be referred to, unless his name is prefaced with the words 'convicted rapist'. It's becoming tedious. The BBC should be dispassionate. Regardless of your opinion on said footballer / illegal shagger then this is a pejorative label, the equivalent of which the Beeb don't seem to be using for other convicted persons who have served their sentence. I find it a bit distasteful. Jonathan King on the other hand should have his balls trapped in a waffle iron because he was responsible for the aural abortion that was Johnny Reggae. No other reason needed.
True story. I know one of the people King abused. His lifes a total ****ing mess still all these years later.
Oof. That's like the old "Can I have your autograph, please? It's not for me, it's for a friend" thing, Chazz. Admit it; it's you wot King messed up, innit?
If there was' such a thing as a democracy,i mean in the real sense, we could do a lot of good things...
Oh the English, the English The English are best, I wouldn't give tuppence For all of the rest. Why not join the Nazi party, you'll all feel at home there.
Oh please explain, explain your mess Are you defending a ***** sex pest? Did the Nazi party believe that state owned television & media outlets should report in an impartial, well balanced & measured manner? Did these Nazis believe that state owned television & media outlets should openly employ & be apologetic towards a child rapist & abuser whilst hypocritically, at the same time, giving airtime to any number of "moral judges" giving their self righteous reasons why another convicted rapist should not be employed in his chosen profession? Here's me thinking the Nazis were merely a racist, anti-semetic, anti-communist bunch with a comical penchant to appear as the Master Race, acting in a dominant manner over other people whilst cleansing society of supposed inferior elements.
just imagine the chants at oldham, "He rapes to the left, He rapes to the right, Ched Evans, rapes 10 birds a night
If wanting to string *****s up makes someone a puritan and a Nazi, there are millions of puritanical Nazis in the UK right now.
Everyone hates *****s but don't you think stating it frequently has become an easy way to show you're a moral person? It's what inmates do in prison to feel better about themselves.
