A woman has alleged that she was repeatedly forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew as part of a lawsuit that claims an American investment banker passed her around rich and powerful friends as a “sex slave” while she was still underage. The accusation was made in a lawsuit brought by women who say they were exploited by Jeffrey Epstein, an American multi-millionaire who was convicted of soliciting sex with an underage girl in 2008, reports the Guardian. The prince is not a named party in the legal claim, and has not had any opportunity to respond to the allegations. He has previously denied any sexual contact with young women associated with Epstein. Buckingham Palace has declined to comment on the allegations, reports the Guardian. A spokesperson said the royal household would not comment on ongoing legal matters, the report said. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/p...ew-named-in-underage-sex-lawsuit-9954198.html
Is this a coincidence that this comes mere months after his mother appeared to be enjoying herself at Celtic Park?
Sudden Adult death syndrome.... The poor girl. Nobody could have seen it coming. Or a horrible accident. Not sure which.
Full of posh journalists writing disingenuous articles on how the world is not fair. Although much better than the Daily Mail, which is full of intelligent journalists pretending they are stupid.
Look - now we're all going to get ISIS Ebola http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...howed-Iraqi-hospital.html?ito=social-facebook
There's the difference between the two papers: one is focussed on smearing a Royal as a *****, the other reports the latest news about murderous loonies who want to kill all non-muslims. Up to you which you'd rather read.
The Mail reports all the funny ****: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...A-Apparel-forced-deny-links-terror-group.html BTW, I'm going to launch a metal detecting clothes brand: Ultimate Detecting Apparel.
For ages I was wondering why a cock carrying Goddess was making the news. Turns out it stands for Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
Ya gotta love the Daily Mail. Such classic journalism as "Builders are hiring Portugese bricklayers on £1000 a week because not enough Britons can do the job" (Daily Mail, December 9). How sad, that those dastardly foreigners are putting salt of the earth Brits out of jobs. The Daily Mail would ban 'em all, right? Better still, have 'em flogged, de-bagged and then sent back across the Channel in a leaky barrel. The owners of that patriotic bastion of Little England would never put Brits out of work in favour of Johnny Foreigner...... Would they..? Funny then, that DMG Media, who own the Daily Mail, outsourced almost all its pre-press imaging work to a company called Fresh Media Group which carries out most of its work in India. Since 2012, the numbers of the Daily Mail's in-house pre-press Division has been cut from 50 to 4. Don't take everything you read in the Mail at face value. As for the Prince Andrew slur, Well, in my opinion we can take that pretty much with a pinch of salt. The allegation has been hung out there but it has been made clear that no prosecution is being sought. Read what you like into that. Personally, I think it's a load of old tosh, but I'm no better informed than anybody else on here. I will admit to being a cynical old fart though and am always a tad disbelieving of people who throw extreme allegations around when there may be a big fat cheque to be made out of "My Exclusive Story" at some time in the future, but are somewhat more hesitant about taking their "Harrowing Tale" into a court where they would be cross examined under oath. Funny, that, isn't it?
The Guardian is the left-wing equivalent of the Daily Mail. They're both ****e but at other ends of the spectrum.
You sometimes get some quite clever stuff on the Guardian though, if you can wade through the arty farty stuff and ignore that wee **** Owen Jones. The Daily Mail is written for ******s and women, big pictures everywhere and loads of mind numbing celebrity gossip - not really the right wing equivalent of the Guardian, that's probably the Telegraph.
I don't mind The Telegraph. It seems like a sensibly-written centre-right newspaper. I agree with you about The Guardian having some intelligent and interesting stuff in it though. However, Owen Jones is a prick and that paper is giving too much publicity to Russell Brand, and Brand is a ****.
