Have you been molested by lizards recently. You clearly didnt see the game so dont comment on something you have no clue about. Go back to conspiracy theories about make believe old chap. Normal people are having a discussion
So, after making a mockery of your stupid stupid post you talk about Lizards and claim I didn't watch a game I clearly did watch, and seen a tackle I did see that was never a red card. "Context of the game" what does that nonsense even mean? The only context there is that matters is either it was a straight red card for dangerous tackle, a second bookable offence or he was preventing a clear goal scoring opportunity, there is no other context you dimwit. It was neither preventing a goal scoring opportunity or a second bookable offence nor a straight red card for dangerous tackle. What context are you talking about?
If you had watched the game, you would be well aware of what it means. You would have noticed a inept referee dishing out yellow cards for nothing much of the time so when the one poor tackle in the game occurs, compared with everything else that took place, it was akin to attempted murder. As you quite obviously didn't, you shouldn't be talking about it. Now as I already stated, I dont think it was a red, but based on the referees awful performance (that would be the context) it should have been.
I watched the game, I don't know what you are talking about because you are talking bollocks, but at least you clarified your bollocks for me. What the ref prviously did on earlier challenges does not and should not interfere with making a correct call, in other words, making a few bad calls doesn't mean he should continue to make bad calls. A red card would have been a bad call as the tackle never warranted a red. There should be no context when making such a call other than the 3 I stated above. If you are talking consistency, that is another matter, we know they are inconsistent as ****
Miralas did the exact same thing to Suarez v Everton and it was a yellow card. At first I thought red but after looking at that tackle again I think yellow was fair. Same situation both players were definitely going for a ball and one gets there first, this is what happened with Agbonthewhore and Young and that red card was rightly overturned. He caught Carrick yes, did he mean to no was it danerous play no, he got there a bit late and a booking would be the right call not a red card. It only looks a red if you take the one frame of the video where his boot looks like it is planted on Carrick's leg, it was not as bad as that, he never planted Carrick. Right call. please log in to view this image If you go by this, it looks like a red card. please log in to view this image
